TSTP Solution File: MGT001-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : MGT001-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:06:38 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : MGT001-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:14:32 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.64 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.64 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.64 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.64 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 % Result :Theorem 0.020000s
% 0.20/0.64 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.020000s
% 0.20/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 % File : MGT001-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.20/0.64 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 0.20/0.64 % Problem : Selection favors organizations with high inertia
% 0.20/0.64 % Version : [PB+94] axioms.
% 0.20/0.64 % English : Selection within populations of organizations in modern
% 0.20/0.64 % societies favours organizations whose structure have high
% 0.20/0.64 % inertia.
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 % Refs : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.20/0.64 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.20/0.64 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.64 % Source : [TPTP]
% 0.20/0.64 % Names :
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.64 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.4.0
% 0.20/0.64 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of literals : 78 ( 0 equ; 60 neg)
% 0.20/0.64 % Maximal clause size : 11 ( 4 avg)
% 0.20/0.64 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of predicates : 8 ( 8 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of variables : 62 ( 4 sgn)
% 0.20/0.64 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT001+1.p
% 0.20/0.64 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(mp1_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.64 | reliability(A,sk1(B,A),B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(mp2_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.64 | accountability(A,sk2(B,A),B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(mp3_3,axiom,
% 0.20/0.65 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | reproducibility(A,sk3(B,A),B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(a1_FOL_4,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reliability(A,E,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reliability(C,F,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ accountability(A,G,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ accountability(C,H,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ survival_chance(A,I,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ survival_chance(C,J,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ greater(F,E)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ greater(H,G)
% 0.20/0.65 | greater(J,I) ) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(a2_FOL_5,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reliability(A,E,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reliability(C,F,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ accountability(A,G,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ accountability(C,H,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ greater(J,I)
% 0.20/0.65 | greater(F,E) ) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(a2_FOL_6,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reliability(A,E,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reliability(C,F,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ accountability(A,G,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ accountability(C,H,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ greater(J,I)
% 0.20/0.65 | greater(H,G) ) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(a2_FOL_7,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reliability(A,E,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reliability(C,F,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ accountability(A,G,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ accountability(C,H,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ greater(F,E)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ greater(H,G)
% 0.20/0.65 | greater(J,I) ) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(a3_FOL_8,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reorganization_free(C,D,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reproducibility(A,E,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reproducibility(C,F,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ inertia(A,G,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ inertia(C,H,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ greater(F,E)
% 0.20/0.65 | greater(H,G) ) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(a3_FOL_9,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reorganization_free(C,D,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reproducibility(A,E,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ reproducibility(C,F,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ inertia(A,G,B)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ inertia(C,H,D)
% 0.20/0.65 | ~ greater(H,G)
% 0.20/0.65 | greater(F,E) ) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(t1_FOL_10,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.65 organization(sk4,sk6) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(t1_FOL_11,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.65 organization(sk5,sk7) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(t1_FOL_12,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.65 reorganization_free(sk4,sk6,sk6) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(t1_FOL_13,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.65 reorganization_free(sk5,sk7,sk7) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(t1_FOL_14,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.65 inertia(sk4,sk8,sk6) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(t1_FOL_15,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.65 inertia(sk5,sk9,sk7) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(t1_FOL_16,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.65 survival_chance(sk4,sk10,sk6) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(t1_FOL_17,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.65 survival_chance(sk5,sk11,sk7) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(t1_FOL_18,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.65 greater(sk9,sk8) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(t1_FOL_19,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.65 ~ greater(sk11,sk10) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.65 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.65 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.65 %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.65 %VarNum:178(SingletonVarNum:62)
% 0.20/0.65 %MaxLitNum:11
% 0.20/0.65 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.65 %SharedTerms:18
% 0.20/0.65 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
% 0.20/0.65 %singleGoalClaCount:10
% 0.20/0.65 [1]P1(a1,a7)
% 0.20/0.65 [2]P1(a8,a9)
% 0.20/0.65 [3]P2(a10,a11)
% 0.20/0.65 [4]P5(a1,a2,a7)
% 0.20/0.65 [5]P5(a8,a4,a9)
% 0.20/0.65 [6]P6(a1,a7,a7)
% 0.20/0.65 [7]P6(a8,a9,a9)
% 0.20/0.65 [8]P4(a1,a11,a7)
% 0.20/0.65 [9]P4(a8,a10,a9)
% 0.20/0.65 [10]~P2(a4,a2)
% 0.20/0.65 [11]~P1(x111,x112)+P7(x111,f3(x112,x111),x112)
% 0.20/0.65 [12]~P1(x121,x122)+P3(x121,f5(x122,x121),x122)
% 0.20/0.65 [13]~P1(x131,x132)+P8(x131,f6(x132,x131),x132)
% 0.20/0.65 [15]~P8(x153,x157,x154)+~P8(x155,x158,x156)+~P6(x153,x154,x154)+~P6(x155,x156,x156)+~P4(x153,x151,x154)+~P4(x155,x152,x156)+P2(x151,x152)+~P1(x153,x154)+~P1(x155,x156)+~P2(x157,x158)
% 0.20/0.65 [17]~P8(x173,x171,x174)+~P8(x175,x172,x176)+~P6(x173,x174,x174)+~P6(x175,x176,x176)+~P4(x173,x177,x174)+~P4(x175,x178,x176)+P2(x171,x172)+~P1(x173,x174)+~P1(x175,x176)+~P2(x177,x178)
% 0.20/0.65 [14]~P3(x143,x141,x144)+~P3(x145,x142,x146)+~P8(x143,x147,x144)+~P8(x145,x148,x146)+P2(x141,x142)+~P1(x143,x144)+~P7(x143,x149,x144)+~P1(x145,x146)+~P7(x145,x1410,x146)+~P2(x147,x148)
% 0.20/0.65 [16]~P7(x163,x161,x164)+~P7(x165,x162,x166)+~P8(x163,x167,x164)+~P8(x165,x168,x166)+P2(x161,x162)+~P1(x163,x164)+~P3(x163,x169,x164)+~P1(x165,x166)+~P3(x165,x1610,x166)+~P2(x167,x168)
% 0.20/0.65 [18]~P7(x183,x189,x184)+~P7(x185,x1810,x186)+~P3(x183,x187,x184)+~P3(x185,x188,x186)+~P8(x183,x181,x184)+~P8(x185,x182,x186)+P2(x181,x182)+~P1(x183,x184)+~P1(x185,x186)+~P2(x187,x188)+~P2(x189,x1810)
% 0.20/0.65 [19]~P7(x193,x199,x194)+~P7(x195,x1910,x196)+~P3(x193,x197,x194)+~P3(x195,x198,x196)+~P5(x193,x191,x194)+~P5(x195,x192,x196)+P2(x191,x192)+~P1(x193,x194)+~P1(x195,x196)+~P2(x197,x198)+~P2(x199,x1910)
% 0.20/0.65 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(20,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (P8(a1,f6(a7,a1),a7)),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,13])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(21,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (P3(a1,f5(a7,a1),a7)),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,13,12])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(22,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (P7(a1,f3(a7,a1),a7)),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,13,12,11])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(43,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (P8(a8,f6(a9,a8),a9)),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,13])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(45,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (P3(a8,f5(a9,a8),a9)),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,13,12])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(47,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (P7(a8,f3(a9,a8),a9)),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,13,12,11])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(57,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (P2(f6(a9,a8),f6(a7,a1))),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,6,7,9,8,20,43,2,1,17])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(72,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (P2(f3(a9,a8),f3(a7,a1))),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[22,21,20,45,47,57,43,2,1,16])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(86,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (~P2(f5(a9,a8),f5(a7,a1))),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,43,8,7,6,9,22,10,21,20,72,45,47,4,57,2,1,14,17,16,18,19])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(92,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 ($false),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[43,22,21,20,86,45,47,57,2,1,14]),
% 0.20/0.65 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.65 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.65 % Total time :0.020000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------