TSTP Solution File: MED002+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : MED002+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 21:55:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : MED002+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 5 01:39:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.20/0.49 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.49 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.49 SPASS derived 190 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 161 clauses.
% 0.20/0.49 SPASS allocated 98343 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.49 SPASS spent 0:00:00.14 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.49 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.49 0:00:00.06 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.49 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.49 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.49 0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 Here is a proof with depth 4, length 37 :
% 0.20/0.49 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.49 1[0:Inp] || -> bcapacityne(n0)*.
% 0.20/0.49 2[0:Inp] || conditionnormo(skc1)* -> .
% 0.20/0.49 3[0:Inp] || gt(n0,skc1)*l -> .
% 0.20/0.49 5[0:Inp] || -> drugbg(u)* gt(n0,u).
% 0.20/0.49 6[0:Inp] || -> drugsu(u)* gt(n0,u).
% 0.20/0.49 8[0:Inp] || gt(u,skf15(u))*r -> .
% 0.20/0.49 9[0:Inp] || gt(u,skf16(u))*r -> .
% 0.20/0.49 13[0:Inp] || gt(u,skf24(u))*r -> .
% 0.20/0.49 15[0:Inp] || gt(u,skf22(u))*r -> .
% 0.20/0.49 16[0:Inp] || -> SkP3(u) releaselg(skf22(u))*.
% 0.20/0.49 19[0:Inp] || gt(n0,u) -> conditionhyper(u)*.
% 0.20/0.49 21[0:Inp] bcapacityex(u) bcapacityne(u) || -> .
% 0.20/0.49 31[0:Inp] || bsecretioni(skf24(u))* -> SkP4(u).
% 0.20/0.49 37[0:Inp] releaselg(u) || drugbg(skf16(v))*+ -> gt(v,u)*.
% 0.20/0.49 39[0:Inp] || drugsu(skf15(u))*+ -> bsecretioni(v)* bcapacityex(u) gt(u,v)*.
% 0.20/0.49 44[0:Inp] SkP4(u) bcapacityne(u) SkP3(u) || -> conditionnormo(v)* gt(u,v)* gt(u,skf21(u))*r.
% 0.20/0.49 45[0:Inp] SkP4(u) bcapacityne(u) SkP3(u) || conditionhyper(skf21(v))* -> conditionnormo(w)* gt(u,w)*.
% 0.20/0.49 50[0:Res:1.0,21.0] bcapacityex(n0) || -> .
% 0.20/0.49 62[0:Res:44.4,3.0] SkP3(n0) bcapacityne(n0) SkP4(n0) || -> gt(n0,skf21(n0))*r conditionnormo(skc1).
% 0.20/0.49 69[0:Res:45.4,3.0] SkP3(n0) bcapacityne(n0) SkP4(n0) || conditionhyper(skf21(u))* -> conditionnormo(skc1).
% 0.20/0.49 85[0:Res:6.1,8.0] || -> drugsu(skf15(n0))*.
% 0.20/0.49 96[0:Res:5.1,9.0] || -> drugbg(skf16(n0))*.
% 0.20/0.49 102[0:MRR:69.1,69.4,1.0,2.0] SkP4(n0) SkP3(n0) || conditionhyper(skf21(u))* -> .
% 0.20/0.49 103[0:MRR:62.1,62.4,1.0,2.0] SkP4(n0) SkP3(n0) || -> gt(n0,skf21(n0))*r.
% 0.20/0.49 247[0:Res:96.0,37.1] releaselg(u) || -> gt(n0,u)*.
% 0.20/0.49 255[0:Res:247.1,15.0] releaselg(skf22(n0)) || -> .
% 0.20/0.49 281[0:SoR:255.0,16.1] || -> SkP3(n0)*.
% 0.20/0.49 282[0:MRR:102.1,281.0] SkP4(n0) || conditionhyper(skf21(u))* -> .
% 0.20/0.49 283[0:MRR:103.1,281.0] SkP4(n0) || -> gt(n0,skf21(n0))*r.
% 0.20/0.49 284[0:Res:85.0,39.0] || -> bsecretioni(u)* bcapacityex(n0) gt(n0,u).
% 0.20/0.49 286[0:MRR:284.1,50.0] || -> bsecretioni(u)* gt(n0,u).
% 0.20/0.49 289[0:Res:286.0,31.0] || -> gt(n0,skf24(u))*r SkP4(u).
% 0.20/0.49 301[0:Res:289.0,13.0] || -> SkP4(n0)*.
% 0.20/0.49 307[0:MRR:282.0,301.0] || conditionhyper(skf21(u))* -> .
% 0.20/0.49 308[0:MRR:283.0,301.0] || -> gt(n0,skf21(n0))*r.
% 0.20/0.49 314[0:Res:19.1,307.0] || gt(n0,skf21(u))*r -> .
% 0.20/0.49 315[0:UnC:314.0,308.0] || -> .
% 0.20/0.49 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.49 Formulae used in the proof : treatmentne sulfonylurea_effect irreflexivity_gt biguanide_effect ne_cure xorcapacity2
% 0.20/0.49
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------