TSTP Solution File: LDA007-2 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LDA007-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qxAeKZkVyX true

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:05:12 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : LDA007-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.6.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qxAeKZkVyX true
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 01:40:33 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.12/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.12/0.34  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.12/0.34  % Running in FO mode
% 0.56/0.64  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.56/0.64  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.56/0.64  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.56/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.56/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.76  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.56/0.76  % BCE start: 20
% 0.56/0.76  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.56/0.76  % PE start: 20
% 0.56/0.76  logic: eq
% 0.56/0.76  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.56/0.76  % done 24 iterations in 0.028s
% 0.56/0.76  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.56/0.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.56/0.76  thf(tt_type, type, tt: $i).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(k_type, type, k: $i).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(s_type, type, s: $i).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(tsk_type, type, tsk: $i).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(t_type, type, t: $i).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(ts_type, type, ts: $i).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(tt_ts_type, type, tt_ts: $i).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(f_type, type, f: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(tk_type, type, tk: $i).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(clause_3, axiom, (( ts ) = ( f @ t @ s ))).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain, (((ts) = (f @ t @ s))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_3])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(clause_1, axiom, (( tt ) = ( f @ t @ t ))).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain, (((tt) = (f @ t @ t))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_1])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(a1, axiom,
% 0.56/0.76    (( f @ X @ ( f @ Y @ Z ) ) = ( f @ ( f @ X @ Y ) @ ( f @ X @ Z ) ))).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.56/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.76         ((f @ X0 @ (f @ X1 @ X2)) = (f @ (f @ X0 @ X1) @ (f @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [a1])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl41, plain,
% 0.56/0.76      (![X0 : $i]: ((f @ t @ (f @ t @ X0)) = (f @ tt @ (f @ t @ X0)))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl106, plain, (((f @ t @ ts) = (f @ tt @ ts))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl41])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(clause_4, axiom, (( tt_ts ) = ( f @ tt @ ts ))).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain, (((tt_ts) = (f @ tt @ ts))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_4])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl109, plain, (((f @ t @ ts) = (tt_ts))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl106, zip_derived_cl12])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(clause_7, axiom, (( tk ) = ( f @ t @ k ))).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain, (((tk) = (f @ t @ k))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_7])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.56/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.76         ((f @ X0 @ (f @ X1 @ X2)) = (f @ (f @ X0 @ X1) @ (f @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [a1])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl43, plain,
% 0.56/0.76      (![X0 : $i]: ((f @ t @ (f @ X0 @ k)) = (f @ (f @ t @ X0) @ tk))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl114, plain, (((f @ t @ (f @ ts @ k)) = (f @ tt_ts @ tk))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl109, zip_derived_cl43])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(clause_9, axiom, (( tsk ) = ( f @ ts @ k ))).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, (((tsk) = (f @ ts @ k))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_9])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl115, plain, (((f @ t @ tsk) = (f @ tt_ts @ tk))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl114, zip_derived_cl17])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(prove_equation, conjecture, (( f @ t @ tsk ) = ( f @ tt_ts @ tk ))).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( f @ t @ tsk ) != ( f @ tt_ts @ tk )),
% 0.56/0.76    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_equation])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain, (((f @ t @ tsk) != (f @ tt_ts @ tk))),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.56/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl116, plain, ($false),
% 0.56/0.76      inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.56/0.76                [zip_derived_cl115, zip_derived_cl19])).
% 0.56/0.76  
% 0.56/0.76  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.56/0.76  
% 0.56/0.76  
% 0.56/0.76  % Terminating...
% 0.61/0.85  % Runner terminated.
% 0.61/0.86  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------