TSTP Solution File: LDA007-2 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : LDA007-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:03:03 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 23
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 18 unt; 16 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 18 ( 17 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 2 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 4 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 12 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
f: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
a: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
critical_point: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
less: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_26,type,
tt: $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
t: $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
st: $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
s: $i ).
tff(decl_30,type,
ts: $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
tt_ts: $i ).
tff(decl_32,type,
k: $i ).
tff(decl_33,type,
sk: $i ).
tff(decl_34,type,
tk: $i ).
tff(decl_35,type,
stk: $i ).
tff(decl_36,type,
tsk: $i ).
tff(decl_37,type,
ttk: $i ).
cnf(a1,axiom,
f(X1,f(X2,X3)) = f(f(X1,X2),f(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1) ).
cnf(clause_1,axiom,
tt = f(t,t),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_1) ).
cnf(clause_7,axiom,
tk = f(t,k),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_7) ).
cnf(clause_3,axiom,
ts = f(t,s),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).
cnf(clause_4,axiom,
tt_ts = f(tt,ts),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4) ).
cnf(clause_9,axiom,
tsk = f(ts,k),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_9) ).
cnf(prove_equation,negated_conjecture,
f(t,tsk) != f(tt_ts,tk),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_equation) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
f(X1,f(X2,X3)) = f(f(X1,X2),f(X1,X3)),
a1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
tt = f(t,t),
clause_1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
tk = f(t,k),
clause_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
f(tt,f(t,X1)) = f(t,f(t,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
ts = f(t,s),
clause_3 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
tt_ts = f(tt,ts),
clause_4 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
f(f(t,X1),tk) = f(t,f(X1,k)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
f(t,ts) = tt_ts,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
tsk = f(ts,k),
clause_9 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
f(t,tsk) != f(tt_ts,tk),
prove_equation ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LDA007-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 01:19:22 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.57 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.59 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.59 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.59 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.59 % Total time : 0.008000 s
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.59 % Total time : 0.011000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------