TSTP Solution File: LCL894+1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : LCL894+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:54:37 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.67s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   67 (  30 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  122 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   96 (  41   ~;  40   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  113 (   9 sgn  48   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(sos_03,axiom,
    ! [X1] : '+'(X1,'0') = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_03) ).

fof(sos_02,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : '+'(X1,X2) = '+'(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_02) ).

fof(sos_09,axiom,
    ! [X12,X13,X14] :
      ( '>='(X12,X13)
     => '>='('+'(X12,X14),'+'(X13,X14)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_09) ).

fof(sos_08,axiom,
    ! [X1] : '>='(X1,'0'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_08) ).

fof(sos_05,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( '>='(X4,X5)
        & '>='(X5,X6) )
     => '>='(X4,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_05) ).

fof(goals_13,conjecture,
    ( ( '>='(c,a)
      & '>='(c,b) )
  <=> '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_13) ).

fof(sos_07,axiom,
    ! [X9,X10,X11] :
      ( '>='('+'(X9,X10),X11)
    <=> '>='(X10,'==>'(X9,X11)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_07) ).

fof(sos_04,axiom,
    ! [X1] : '>='(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_04) ).

fof(sos_06,axiom,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ( '>='(X7,X8)
        & '>='(X8,X7) )
     => X7 = X8 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_06) ).

fof(sos_10,axiom,
    ! [X15,X16,X17] :
      ( '>='(X15,X16)
     => '>='('==>'(X16,X17),'==>'(X15,X17)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_10) ).

fof(sos_12,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : '+'(X1,'==>'(X1,X2)) = '+'(X2,'==>'(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_12) ).

fof(sos_11,axiom,
    ! [X18,X19,X20] :
      ( '>='(X18,X19)
     => '>='('==>'(X20,X18),'==>'(X20,X19)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_11) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X26] : '+'(X26,'0') = X26,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_03]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X24,X25] : '+'(X24,X25) = '+'(X25,X24),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_02]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X37,X38,X39] :
      ( ~ '>='(X37,X38)
      | '>='('+'(X37,X39),'+'(X38,X39)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_09])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    '+'(X1,'0') = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    '+'(X1,X2) = '+'(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X36] : '>='(X36,'0'),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_08]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X28,X29,X30] :
      ( ~ '>='(X28,X29)
      | ~ '>='(X29,X30)
      | '>='(X28,X30) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_05])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( '>='('+'(X1,X3),'+'(X2,X3))
    | ~ '>='(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    '+'('0',X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    '>='(X1,'0'),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( '>='(X1,X3)
    | ~ '>='(X1,X2)
    | ~ '>='(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    '>='('+'(X1,X2),X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).

fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( '>='(c,a)
        & '>='(c,b) )
    <=> '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( '>='(X1,X2)
    | ~ '>='(X1,'+'(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ '>='(c,a)
      | ~ '>='(c,b)
      | ~ '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b))) )
    & ( '>='(c,a)
      | '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b))) )
    & ( '>='(c,b)
      | '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b))) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])])]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X33,X34,X35] :
      ( ( ~ '>='('+'(X33,X34),X35)
        | '>='(X34,'==>'(X33,X35)) )
      & ( ~ '>='(X34,'==>'(X33,X35))
        | '>='('+'(X33,X34),X35) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_07])])]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X27] : '>='(X27,X27),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_04]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( '>='(X1,X2)
    | ~ '>='(X1,'+'(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(c,a)
    | '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X31,X32] :
      ( ~ '>='(X31,X32)
      | ~ '>='(X32,X31)
      | X31 = X32 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_06])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( '>='('+'(X2,X1),X3)
    | ~ '>='(X1,'==>'(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    '>='(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    '>='(c,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ '>='(X1,X2)
    | ~ '>='(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( '>='(X2,'==>'(X1,X3))
    | ~ '>='('+'(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    '>='('+'(X1,'==>'(X1,X2)),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(X1,a)
    | ~ '>='(X1,c) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    '>='('+'(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_40,plain,
    ! [X40,X41,X42] :
      ( ~ '>='(X40,X41)
      | '>='('==>'(X41,X42),'==>'(X40,X42)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_10])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( '==>'(X1,X2) = X3
    | ~ '>='('==>'(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ '>='('+'(X1,X3),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    '>='('==>'('0',X1),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( '>='(X1,'==>'(X2,X3))
    | ~ '>='('+'(X2,X4),X3)
    | ~ '>='(X1,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    '>='('+'(c,X1),a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( '>='('==>'(X2,X3),'==>'(X1,X3))
    | ~ '>='(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    '==>'('0',X1) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_20]),c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(X1,'==>'(c,a))
    | ~ '>='(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    '>='(X1,'==>'(X2,X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_21])]) ).

fof(c_0_49,plain,
    ! [X46,X47] : '+'(X46,'==>'(X46,X47)) = '+'(X47,'==>'(X47,X46)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( '0' = X1
    | ~ '>='('0',X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    '>='(X1,'==>'(c,a)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    '+'(X1,'==>'(X1,X2)) = '+'(X2,'==>'(X2,X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    '==>'(c,a) = '0',
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ '>='(c,a)
    | ~ '>='(c,b)
    | ~ '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( '>='(X1,X2)
    | ~ '>='(X1,'+'(X3,'==>'(X3,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(c,b)
    | '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    ( '>='('+'(X1,X2),'+'(X3,X1))
    | ~ '>='(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    '+'(a,'==>'(a,c)) = c,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]),c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_59,plain,
    ! [X43,X44,X45] :
      ( ~ '>='(X43,X44)
      | '>='('==>'(X45,X43),'==>'(X45,X44)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_11])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b)))
    | ~ '>='(c,b) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_34])]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    '>='(c,b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(c,'+'(X1,a))
    | ~ '>='('==>'(a,c),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    ( '>='('==>'(X3,X1),'==>'(X3,X2))
    | ~ '>='(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    ~ '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61])]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,X1)))
    | ~ '>='(c,X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]),c_0_61])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : LCL894+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 02:46:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.67/0.62  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.67/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.67/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.67/0.62  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.67/0.62  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.62  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.62  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.62  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4525 completed with status 0
% 0.67/0.62  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.67/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.67/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.67/0.62  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.67/0.62  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.67/0.62  # Search class: FGHSM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.67/0.62  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.67/0.62  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.62  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.62  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.62  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.62  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.62  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 4531 completed with status 0
% 0.67/0.62  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.67/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.67/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.67/0.62  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.67/0.62  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.67/0.62  # Search class: FGHSM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.67/0.62  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.67/0.62  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.62  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.67/0.62  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.67/0.62  
% 0.67/0.62  # Proof found!
% 0.67/0.62  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.67/0.62  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.67/0.62  # Parsed axioms                        : 13
% 0.67/0.62  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.67/0.62  # Initial clauses                      : 16
% 0.67/0.62  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.67/0.62  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 16
% 0.67/0.62  # Processed clauses                    : 1806
% 0.67/0.62  # ...of these trivial                  : 87
% 0.67/0.62  # ...subsumed                          : 1352
% 0.67/0.62  # ...remaining for further processing  : 367
% 0.67/0.62  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.67/0.62  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.67/0.62  # Backward-subsumed                    : 52
% 0.67/0.62  # Backward-rewritten                   : 49
% 0.67/0.62  # Generated clauses                    : 8076
% 0.67/0.62  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6984
% 0.67/0.62  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.67/0.62  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 9
% 0.67/0.62  # Paramodulations                      : 8076
% 0.67/0.62  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.67/0.62  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.67/0.62  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.67/0.62  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.67/0.62  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3007
% 0.67/0.62  # ...of those cached                   : 2492
% 0.67/0.62  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.67/0.62  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.67/0.62  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.67/0.62  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.67/0.62  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.67/0.62  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.67/0.62  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.67/0.62  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.67/0.62  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.67/0.62  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.67/0.62  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.67/0.62  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.67/0.62  # Current number of processed clauses  : 250
% 0.67/0.62  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 49
% 0.67/0.62  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
% 0.67/0.62  #    Negative unit clauses             : 30
% 0.67/0.62  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 162
% 0.67/0.62  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5035
% 0.67/0.62  # ...number of literals in the above   : 10530
% 0.67/0.62  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.67/0.62  # Current number of archived clauses   : 117
% 0.67/0.62  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7366
% 0.67/0.62  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6752
% 0.67/0.62  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 591
% 0.67/0.62  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 406
% 0.67/0.62  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.67/0.62  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 198
% 0.67/0.62  # BW rewrite match successes           : 71
% 0.67/0.62  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.67/0.62  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.67/0.62  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 77157
% 0.67/0.62  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 127
% 0.67/0.62  
% 0.67/0.62  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.62  # User time                : 0.104 s
% 0.67/0.62  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.67/0.62  # Total time               : 0.111 s
% 0.67/0.62  # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 0.67/0.62  
% 0.67/0.62  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.62  # User time                : 0.497 s
% 0.67/0.62  # System time              : 0.019 s
% 0.67/0.62  # Total time               : 0.516 s
% 0.67/0.62  # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.67/0.62  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.67/0.62  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------