TSTP Solution File: LCL856-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL856-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:33:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.19s 0.50s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL856-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 12:30:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.37 The process was started by sandbox2 on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.37 Sun Jul 3 12:30:08 2022
% 0.19/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 27075.
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.37 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.37 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.37 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 85 during input processing: 0 [] {-} hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Transitive__Closure_Otranclp(A,B),C),D))|C=D| -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Transitive__Closure_Ortranclp(A,B),C),D)).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_Wellfounded_Oaccp(A,B,C)| -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(A,B),D))| -c_Wellfounded_Oaccp(A,D,C).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 117 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_Wellfounded_Oaccp(A,B,C)| -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Transitive__Closure_Ortranclp(A,C),B),D))| -c_Wellfounded_Oaccp(A,D,C).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 124 during input processing: 0 [] {-} hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Predicate_Oconversep(A,B,C),D),E))| -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(A,E),D)).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 125 during input processing: 0 [] {-} hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(A,B),C))| -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Predicate_Oconversep(A,D,E),C),B)).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 73 during input processing: 0 [copy,21,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)!=hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,B),C).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 99 during input processing: 0 [copy,60,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(B).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,73,flip.1] {-} hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,A),B)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(C).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 98 during input processing: 0 [copy,95,flip.1] {-} hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,A),B)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(C).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 95 during input processing: 0 [copy,98,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)!=hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,B),C).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 60 during input processing: 0 [copy,99,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(B).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 22 during input processing: 0 [copy,149,flip.1] {-} hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)),B)!=c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(C),D,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [copy,153,flip.1] {-} c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A),B,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)!=c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(C),D,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB).
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 179 during input processing: 0 [] {-} hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Transitive__Closure_Ortranclp(A,B),C),C)).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 220 during input processing: 0 [copy,164,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 220 during input processing: 0 [copy,174,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 220 during input processing: 0 [copy,220,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.37 220 back subsumes 174.
% 0.19/0.37 220 back subsumes 164.
% 0.19/0.37 220 back subsumes 154.
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 204 during input processing: 0 [copy,221,flip.1] {-} c_Predicate_Oconversep(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(A,B,tc_fun(C,tc_fun(D,tc_bool))),C,D)=c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(c_Predicate_Oconversep(A,C,D),c_Predicate_Oconversep(B,C,D),tc_fun(D,tc_fun(C,tc_bool))).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 206 during input processing: 0 [copy,222,flip.1] {-} c_Predicate_Oconversep(c_Lattices_Olower__semilattice__class_Oinf(A,B,tc_fun(C,tc_fun(D,tc_bool))),C,D)=c_Lattices_Olower__semilattice__class_Oinf(c_Predicate_Oconversep(A,C,D),c_Predicate_Oconversep(B,C,D),tc_fun(D,tc_fun(C,tc_bool))).
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.49 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.49 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.49 number of clauses in intial UL: 151
% 0.19/0.49 number of clauses initially in problem: 202
% 0.19/0.49 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 74
% 0.19/0.49 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 95
% 0.19/0.49 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.49 absolute distinct symbol count: 49
% 0.19/0.49 distinct predicate count: 11
% 0.19/0.49 distinct function count: 27
% 0.19/0.49 distinct constant count: 11
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.50 c_Lattices_Olower__semilattice__class_Oinf(c_Lattices_Olower__semilattice__class_Oinf(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(A,B,tc_fun(C,tc_nat)),c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(D,B,tc_fun(C,tc_nat)),tc_fun(C,tc_nat)),c_Lattices_Olower__semilattice__class_Oinf(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(A,D,tc_fun(C,tc_nat)),c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(D,D,tc_fun(C,tc_nat)),tc_fun(C,tc_nat)),tc_fun(C,tc_nat))=c_Lattices_Olower__semilattice__class_Oinf(c_Lattices_Oupper__semilattice__class_Osup(A,B,tc_fun(C,tc_nat)),D,tc_fun(C,tc_nat)).
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.19/0.50 51 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1628.6 K.
% 0.19/0.50 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.19/0.50 sym_ent ( 304) 205 0 205 0 60.9 K
% 0.19/0.50 term ( 32) 36022 30372 5650 40 177.8 K
% 0.19/0.50 rel ( 40) 30105 21566 8539 34 334.9 K
% 0.19/0.50 term_ptr ( 16) 29568 1122 28446 32 445.0 K
% 0.19/0.50 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.19/0.50 fpa_head ( 24) 3587 93 3494 0 81.9 K
% 0.19/0.50 fpa_tree ( 56) 2369 2369 0 21 1.1 K
% 0.19/0.50 context (1288) 5410 5410 0 5 6.3 K
% 0.19/0.50 trail ( 24) 28224 28224 0 8 0.2 K
% 0.19/0.50 imd_tree ( 32) 489 156 333 22 11.1 K
% 0.19/0.50 imd_pos (4024) 2167 2167 0 7 27.5 K
% 0.19/0.50 is_tree ( 24) 4501 254 4247 23 100.1 K
% 0.19/0.50 is_pos (2424) 38733 38733 0 14 33.1 K
% 0.19/0.50 fsub_pos ( 16) 3006 3006 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.19/0.50 literal ( 32) 2548 567 1981 1 61.9 K
% 0.19/0.50 clause ( 88) 1239 250 989 1 85.1 K
% 0.19/0.50 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.19/0.50 clash_nd ( 80) 9 9 0 3 0.2 K
% 0.19/0.50 clause_ptr ( 16) 943 124 819 4 12.9 K
% 0.19/0.50 int_ptr ( 16) 6432 1372 5060 5 79.1 K
% 0.19/0.50 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.19/0.50 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.19/0.50 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.19/0.50 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.19/0.50 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.19/0.50 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.19/0.50 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.19/0.50 00
% 0.19/0.50 pre_process time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 renumber time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 demod time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 order equalities 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 unit deleletion 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 factor simplify 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 weigh cl time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 hints keep time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 sort lits time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 forward subsume 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 delete cl time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 keep cl time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 hints time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 conflict time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 new demod time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 post_process time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 back demod time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 back subsume 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 factor time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50 unindex time 0.00
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.19/0.50 1:1 2:1 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 0.19/0.50 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.19/0.50 21:1 22:1 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:1 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.19/0.50 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.19/0.50 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.19/0.50 51:0 52:7 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 0.19/0.50 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.19/0.50 71:0 72:0 73:2 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:3 79:0 80:0
% 0.19/0.50 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:1 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.19/0.50 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:1 96:0 97:0 98:1 99:1
% 0.19/0.50 All others: 151.
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------