TSTP Solution File: LCL856-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : LCL856-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:53:48 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Wellfounded_Oaccp(c_Predicate_Oconversep(c_Lambda_Obeta,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_t,tc_Lambda_OdB),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_IT__implies__termi_0,axiom,
( c_Wellfounded_Oaccp(c_Predicate_Oconversep(c_Lambda_Obeta,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),X1,tc_Lambda_OdB)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_IT__implies__termi_0) ).
cnf(cls_type__implies__IT_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,X1))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X2,X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_type__implies__IT_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e,v_t,v_T),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Wellfounded_Oaccp(c_Predicate_Oconversep(c_Lambda_Obeta,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_t,tc_Lambda_OdB),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( c_Wellfounded_Oaccp(c_Predicate_Oconversep(c_Lambda_Obeta,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),X1,tc_Lambda_OdB)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_IT__implies__termi_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,X1))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X2,X1,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_type__implies__IT_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Wellfounded_Oaccp(c_Predicate_Oconversep(c_Lambda_Obeta,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_t,tc_Lambda_OdB),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( c_Wellfounded_Oaccp(c_Predicate_Oconversep(c_Lambda_Obeta,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),X1,tc_Lambda_OdB)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,X1)) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,X1))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X2,X1,X3) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e,v_t,v_T),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,v_t)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : LCL856-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 20 01:46:22 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # new_bool_1 with pid 785 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGUSM-FFLF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # partial match(2): FGHSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I with pid 787 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGUSM-FFLF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # partial match(2): FGHSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 187
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 84
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses : 103
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 103
% 0.19/0.49 # Processed clauses : 119
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # ...subsumed : 9
% 0.19/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 107
% 0.19/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Generated clauses : 5
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 76
% 0.19/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 160
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 91
% 0.19/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 812
% 0.19/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 807
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.19/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.19/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5108
% 0.19/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 595
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1996 pages
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1852 pages
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------