TSTP Solution File: LCL852-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : LCL852-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:40:11 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 7.68s 1.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 10 ( 0 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 8 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_615,plain,
( ~ c_Type_Otyping(X0,X1,hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,X2),X3))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X0,X4,X2)
| c_Type_Otyping(X0,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X1),X4),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_typing_OApp_0) ).
cnf(c_625,plain,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ta____),v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(v_ta____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_Ta____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_626,plain,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ta____),v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ta____),v_U____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
cnf(c_627,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ta____),v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),c_Lambda_Olift(v_ta____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),v_U____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_18232,plain,
( ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ta____),v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),X0,v_Ta____)
| c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ta____),v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),X0),v_U____) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_626,c_615]) ).
cnf(c_18667,plain,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ta____),v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(v_ta____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_Ta____),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_18232,c_627]) ).
cnf(c_18668,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_625,c_18667]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : LCL852-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 2 18:56:16 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 7.68/1.65 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.68/1.65 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65 ------ iProver source info
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 7.68/1.65 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 7.68/1.65 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65 ------ Parsing...successful
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 28 sf_s rm: 89 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e sup_sim: 5 sf_s rm: 23 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 23 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 7.68/1.65 ------ Proving...
% 7.68/1.65 ------ Problem Properties
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65 clauses 302
% 7.68/1.65 conjectures 1
% 7.68/1.65 EPR 32
% 7.68/1.65 Horn 262
% 7.68/1.65 unary 108
% 7.68/1.65 binary 136
% 7.68/1.65 lits 569
% 7.68/1.65 lits eq 191
% 7.68/1.65 fd_pure 0
% 7.68/1.65 fd_pseudo 0
% 7.68/1.65 fd_cond 15
% 7.68/1.65 fd_pseudo_cond 32
% 7.68/1.65 AC symbols 0
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65 ------
% 7.68/1.65 Current options:
% 7.68/1.65 ------
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65 ------ Proving...
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.68/1.65
% 7.68/1.65
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------