TSTP Solution File: LCL850-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : LCL850-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 00:03:57 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 2 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_typing_OVar_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),hAPP(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_typing_OVar_0) ).
cnf(cls_shift__eq_0,axiom,
hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2) = X3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_shift__eq_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),hAPP(X1,X2)),
cls_typing_OVar_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2) = X3,
cls_shift__eq_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____)),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : LCL850-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 20 01:53:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.60 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.60 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 # new_bool_1 with pid 11946 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.60 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.60 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.60 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.60 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 11954 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.20/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.60 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.60 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.60 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.60 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 # Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.60 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.60 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.60 # Parsed axioms : 902
% 0.20/0.60 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 579
% 0.20/0.60 # Initial clauses : 323
% 0.20/0.60 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Initial clauses in saturation : 323
% 0.20/0.60 # Processed clauses : 686
% 0.20/0.60 # ...of these trivial : 31
% 0.20/0.60 # ...subsumed : 301
% 0.20/0.60 # ...remaining for further processing : 354
% 0.20/0.60 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.20/0.60 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Backward-subsumed : 9
% 0.20/0.60 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.20/0.60 # Generated clauses : 6321
% 0.20/0.60 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5366
% 0.20/0.60 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.20/0.60 # Paramodulations : 6290
% 0.20/0.60 # Factorizations : 4
% 0.20/0.60 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Equation resolutions : 27
% 0.20/0.60 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Total rewrite steps : 3399
% 0.20/0.60 # ...of those cached : 2696
% 0.20/0.60 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.60 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.60 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.60 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.60 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.60 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.60 # Current number of processed clauses : 338
% 0.20/0.60 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 74
% 0.20/0.60 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.20/0.60 # Negative unit clauses : 31
% 0.20/0.60 # Non-unit-clauses : 230
% 0.20/0.60 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4991
% 0.20/0.60 # ...number of literals in the above : 12647
% 0.20/0.60 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Current number of archived clauses : 16
% 0.20/0.60 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10194
% 0.20/0.60 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9566
% 0.20/0.60 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 150
% 0.20/0.60 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 959
% 0.20/0.60 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.60 # BW rewrite match attempts : 75
% 0.20/0.60 # BW rewrite match successes : 31
% 0.20/0.60 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.60 # Termbank termtop insertions : 132799
% 0.20/0.60 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2606
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 # User time : 0.107 s
% 0.20/0.60 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.60 # Total time : 0.119 s
% 0.20/0.60 # Maximum resident set size: 2788 pages
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 # User time : 0.123 s
% 0.20/0.60 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.20/0.60 # Total time : 0.136 s
% 0.20/0.60 # Maximum resident set size: 2316 pages
% 0.20/0.60 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------