TSTP Solution File: LCL850-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : LCL850-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:53:47 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.10s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 2 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_typing_OVar_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),hAPP(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_typing_OVar_0) ).
cnf(cls_shift__eq_0,axiom,
hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2) = X3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_shift__eq_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),hAPP(X1,X2)),
cls_typing_OVar_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2) = X3,
cls_shift__eq_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____)),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : LCL850-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 01:53:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.10/0.62 # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.10/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.10/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.10/0.62 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 1.10/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.10/0.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 8610 completed with status 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 1.10/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.10/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.10/0.62 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 1.10/0.62 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.10/0.62 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.10/0.62 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 1.10/0.62 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62 # Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 90s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62 # G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 8620 completed with status 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Result found by G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 1.10/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.10/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.10/0.62 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 1.10/0.62 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.10/0.62 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.10/0.62 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 1.10/0.62 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 1.10/0.62 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.10/0.62
% 1.10/0.62 # Proof found!
% 1.10/0.62 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.10/0.62 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.10/0.62 # Parsed axioms : 902
% 1.10/0.62 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Initial clauses : 902
% 1.10/0.62 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 1.10/0.62 # Initial clauses in saturation : 901
% 1.10/0.62 # Processed clauses : 1064
% 1.10/0.62 # ...of these trivial : 40
% 1.10/0.62 # ...subsumed : 154
% 1.10/0.62 # ...remaining for further processing : 870
% 1.10/0.62 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 1.10/0.62 # Backward-rewritten : 9
% 1.10/0.62 # Generated clauses : 99
% 1.10/0.62 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 60
% 1.10/0.62 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 1.10/0.62 # Paramodulations : 94
% 1.10/0.62 # Factorizations : 2
% 1.10/0.62 # NegExts : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 1.10/0.62 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Total rewrite steps : 146
% 1.10/0.62 # ...of those cached : 69
% 1.10/0.62 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.10/0.62 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.10/0.62 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.10/0.62 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.10/0.62 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.10/0.62 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.10/0.62 # Current number of processed clauses : 135
% 1.10/0.62 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 93
% 1.10/0.62 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 1.10/0.62 # Negative unit clauses : 17
% 1.10/0.62 # Non-unit-clauses : 24
% 1.10/0.62 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 621
% 1.10/0.62 # ...number of literals in the above : 1646
% 1.10/0.62 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Current number of archived clauses : 736
% 1.10/0.62 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 61427
% 1.10/0.62 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41557
% 1.10/0.62 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 128
% 1.10/0.62 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 345
% 1.10/0.62 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # BW rewrite match attempts : 79
% 1.10/0.62 # BW rewrite match successes : 36
% 1.10/0.62 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.10/0.62 # Termbank termtop insertions : 37604
% 1.10/0.62 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1641
% 1.10/0.62
% 1.10/0.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.10/0.62 # User time : 0.085 s
% 1.10/0.62 # System time : 0.008 s
% 1.10/0.62 # Total time : 0.093 s
% 1.10/0.62 # Maximum resident set size: 3448 pages
% 1.10/0.62
% 1.10/0.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.10/0.62 # User time : 0.327 s
% 1.10/0.62 # System time : 0.034 s
% 1.10/0.62 # Total time : 0.361 s
% 1.10/0.62 # Maximum resident set size: 2312 pages
% 1.10/0.62 % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.10/0.63 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------