%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : LCL825-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:18:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.36s
% Output   : Proof 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    ~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    sPE(c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nil__is__map__conv_1)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ( ~ sPE(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(c_List_Oreplicate(c_InductTermi_OIT,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_List_Olist(tc_Lambda_OdB)),c_InductTermi_OIT)
    | ~ sPE(c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))
    | ~ sPE(tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)
    | ~ c_List_Olistsp(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(c_List_Oreplicate(c_InductTermi_OIT,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_List_Olist(tc_Lambda_OdB)),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB)
    | c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    c_List_Olistsp(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(c_List_Oreplicate(c_InductTermi_OIT,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_List_Olist(tc_Lambda_OdB)),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_listsp_ONil_0)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    sPE(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(c_List_Oreplicate(c_InductTermi_OIT,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_List_Olist(tc_Lambda_OdB)),c_InductTermi_OIT),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_length__replicate_0)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    sPE(tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : LCL825-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 21:51:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  % symbols: 123
% 0.13/0.36  % clauses: 593
% 0.13/0.36  % start clauses: 1
% 0.13/0.36  % iterative deepening steps: 29
% 0.13/0.36  % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.13/0.36  % literal attempts: 868
% 0.13/0.36  % depth failures: 762
% 0.13/0.36  % regularity failures: 11
% 0.13/0.36  % tautology failures: 5
% 0.13/0.36  % reductions: 0
% 0.13/0.36  % extensions: 854
% 0.13/0.36  % SAT variables: 941
% 0.13/0.36  % SAT clauses: 802
% 0.13/0.36  % WalkSAT solutions: 798
% 0.13/0.36  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.13/0.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.36  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------