TSTP Solution File: LCL818-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : LCL818-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:40:05 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 1.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 10 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_377,plain,
( ~ c_Type_Otyping(X0,X1,hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,X2),X3))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X0,X4,X2)
| c_Type_Otyping(X0,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X1),X4),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_App_0) ).
cnf(c_421,plain,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,v_u____,v_i____),v_T_H_H____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_422,plain,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
cnf(c_423,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,v_u____),c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,v_u____,v_i____)),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_3615,plain,
( ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,X0),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,v_u____,v_i____),X0)
| c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,v_u____),c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,v_u____,v_i____)),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_377]) ).
cnf(c_4141,plain,
( ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,v_u____,v_i____),v_T_H_H____)
| c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,v_u____),c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,v_u____,v_i____)),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_3615]) ).
cnf(c_4142,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_4141,c_423,c_422,c_421]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LCL818-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 2 19:12:49 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.49/1.18 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18 ------ iProver source info
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.49/1.18 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.49/1.18 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18 ------ Parsing...successful
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 pe_s pe_e
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e scvd_s sp: 10 0s scvd_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18 ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.49/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 0.49/1.18 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18 clauses 299
% 0.49/1.18 conjectures 1
% 0.49/1.18 EPR 17
% 0.49/1.18 Horn 265
% 0.49/1.18 unary 118
% 0.49/1.18 binary 139
% 0.49/1.18 lits 532
% 0.49/1.18 lits eq 215
% 0.49/1.18 fd_pure 0
% 0.49/1.18 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.49/1.18 fd_cond 9
% 0.49/1.18 fd_pseudo_cond 43
% 0.49/1.18 AC symbols 0
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18 ------
% 0.49/1.18 Current options:
% 0.49/1.18 ------
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.49/1.18
% 0.49/1.18
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------