TSTP Solution File: LCL814-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : LCL814-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:26:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.37s 2.55s
% Output : Refutation 2.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 7 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 10 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_uT_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_uT_0) ).
cnf(cls_argsT_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_as____,v_Ts____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_argsT_0) ).
cnf(cls_substs__lemma_0,axiom,
( c_Type_Otypings(X,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),Y),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),Z),U,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),V)
| ~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(X,Z,W,tc_Type_Otype),U,V)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X,Y,W) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_substs__lemma_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otypings(v_e____,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(4255,plain,
$false,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_substs__lemma_0,cls_conjecture_0,cls_argsT_0,cls_uT_0]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL814-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 06:37:44 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.47 *
% 0.21/0.47 *
% 0.21/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.47 *
% 0.21/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.47 *
% 0.21/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.47 *
% 0.21/0.47 "."
% 0.21/0.47 *
% 0.21/0.48 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-04T06:37:45
% 0.21/0.48 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n013.cluster.edu at 2022-07-04T06:37:45
% 0.44/0.62
% 0.44/0.62 ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 2.37/2.55 ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 2.37/2.55
% 2.37/2.55 #||
% 2.37/2.55 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.37/2.55 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.37/2.55 ||#
% 2.37/2.55
% 2.37/2.55 ; Summary of computation:
% 2.37/2.55 ; 11362 formulas have been input or derived (from 537 formulas).
% 2.37/2.55 ; 4255 (37%) were retained. Of these,
% 2.37/2.55 ; 340 ( 8%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 2.37/2.55 ; 3915 (92%) are still being kept.
% 2.37/2.55 ;
% 2.37/2.55 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.128 6% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.010 0% Assert (682 calls)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.402 19% Process new row (10,215 calls)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.233 11% Resolution (1,072 calls)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.086 4% Paramodulation (536 calls)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (15 calls)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.050 2% Condensing (4,224 calls)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.383 18% Forward subsumption (4,224 calls)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.130 6% Backward subsumption (2,186 calls)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.064 3% Clause clause subsumption (9,553 calls)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.342 16% Forward simplification (10,106 calls)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.058 3% Backward simplification (4,243 calls)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.102 5% Ordering (21,837 calls)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.001 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 0.088 4% Other
% 2.37/2.55 ; 2.077 Total
% 2.37/2.55 ; 2.077 Real time
% 2.37/2.55 ;
% 2.37/2.55 ; Term-hash-array has 11,748 terms in all.
% 2.37/2.55 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,024 entries (2,024 at peak, 2,186 added, 162 deleted).
% 2.37/2.55 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 16,907 nodes (16,907 at peak, 18,086 added, 1,179 deleted).
% 2.37/2.55 ; Retrieved 18,812 possibly forward subsuming rows in 4,224 calls.
% 2.37/2.55 ; Retrieved 787 possibly backward subsumed rows in 2,186 calls.
% 2.37/2.55 ; Path-index has 11,081 entries (11,081 at peak, 11,938 added, 857 deleted).
% 2.37/2.55 ; Path-index has 26,669 nodes (26,669 at peak, 28,302 added, 1,633 deleted).
% 2.37/2.55 ; Trie-index has 11,081 entries (11,081 at peak, 11,938 added, 857 deleted).
% 2.37/2.55 ; Trie-index has 56,367 nodes (56,367 at peak, 62,959 added, 6,592 deleted).
% 2.37/2.55 ; Retrieved 37,442 generalization terms in 64,632 calls.
% 2.37/2.55 ; Retrieved 3,445 instance terms in 2,493 calls.
% 2.37/2.55 ; Retrieved 305,106 unifiable terms in 7,825 calls.
% 2.37/2.55 ;
% 2.37/2.55 ; The agenda of rows to process has 5 entries:
% 2.37/2.55 ; 1 with value 6 1 with value 30 1 with value 64
% 2.37/2.55 ; 1 with value 11 1 with value 63
% 2.37/2.55 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 28 entries:
% 2.37/2.55 ; 1 with value 45 3 with value 51 1 with value 59
% 2.37/2.55 ; 1 with value 46 2 with value 52 2 with value 62
% 2.37/2.55 ; 2 with value 47 1 with value 55 1 with value 63
% 2.37/2.55 ; 5 with value 48 2 with value 57 1 with value 100
% 2.37/2.55 ; 3 with value 49 1 with value 58 1 with value 101
% 2.37/2.55 ; 1 with value 50
% 2.37/2.55 ; The agenda of rows to give has 3380 entries:
% 2.37/2.55 ; 3 with value (4 4) 115 with value (4 33) 8 with value (4 60)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 4 with value (4 6) 74 with value (4 34) 8 with value (4 61)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 6 with value (4 7) 111 with value (4 35) 11 with value (4 62)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 6 with value (4 8) 52 with value (4 36) 8 with value (4 63)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 13 with value (4 9) 84 with value (4 37) 3 with value (4 64)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 12 with value (4 10) 72 with value (4 38) 10 with value (4 65)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 25 with value (4 11) 86 with value (4 39) 3 with value (4 66)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 13 with value (4 12) 89 with value (4 40) 6 with value (4 67)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 37 with value (4 13) 69 with value (4 41) 2 with value (4 68)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 42 with value (4 14) 77 with value (4 42) 6 with value (4 69)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 73 with value (4 15) 44 with value (4 43) 5 with value (4 70)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 55 with value (4 16) 47 with value (4 44) 5 with value (4 71)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 63 with value (4 17) 41 with value (4 45) 2 with value (4 72)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 90 with value (4 18) 44 with value (4 46) 1 with value (4 74)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 83 with value (4 19) 44 with value (4 47) 1 with value (4 75)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 105 with value (4 20) 51 with value (4 48) 7 with value (4 76)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 90 with value (4 21) 40 with value (4 49) 2 with value (4 78)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 90 with value (4 22) 35 with value (4 50) 1 with value (4 79)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 131 with value (4 23) 26 with value (4 51) 2 with value (4 82)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 101 with value (4 24) 30 with value (4 52) 1 with value (4 84)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 94 with value (4 25) 19 with value (4 53) 1 with value (4 93)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 111 with value (4 26) 29 with value (4 54) 1 with value (4 97)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 73 with value (4 27) 23 with value (4 55) 1 with value (4 98)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 114 with value (4 28) 18 with value (4 56) 1 with value (4 99)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 122 with value (4 29) 20 with value (4 57) 1 with value (4 112)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 138 with value (4 30) 13 with value (4 58) 1 with value (4 155)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 108 with value (4 31) 18 with value (4 59) 1 with value (4 158)
% 2.37/2.55 ; 108 with value (4 32)
% 2.37/2.55 Evaluation took:
% 2.37/2.55 2.079 seconds of real time
% 2.37/2.55 1.935616 seconds of user run time
% 2.37/2.55 0.143906 seconds of system run time
% 2.37/2.55 [Run times include 0.277 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.37/2.55 0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.37/2.55 0 page faults and
% 2.37/2.55 174,039,584 bytes consed.
% 2.37/2.55 :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.37/2.55 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-04T06:37:47
% 2.37/2.55 :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.37/2.55 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------