TSTP Solution File: LCL811-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : LCL811-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:26:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.65s
% Output   : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (  10 equ;   1 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;   9 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_rev__singleton__conv_1,axiom,
    c_List_Orev(c_List_Olist_OCons(X,c_List_Olist_ONil(Y),Y),Y) = c_List_Olist_OCons(X,c_List_Olist_ONil(Y),Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_rev__singleton__conv_1) ).

cnf(cls_eq__Nil__appendI_0,axiom,
    X = c_List_Oappend(c_List_Olist_ONil(Y),X,Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_eq__Nil__appendI_0) ).

cnf(cls_rev__eq__Cons__iff_1,axiom,
    c_List_Orev(c_List_Oappend(c_List_Orev(X,Y),c_List_Olist_OCons(Z,c_List_Olist_ONil(Y),Y),Y),Y) = c_List_Olist_OCons(Z,X,Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_rev__eq__Cons__iff_1) ).

cnf(cls_rev__is__Nil__conv_1,axiom,
    c_List_Orev(c_List_Olist_ONil(X),X) = c_List_Olist_ONil(X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_rev__is__Nil__conv_1) ).

cnf(cls_map__append_0,axiom,
    c_List_Omap(X,c_List_Oappend(Y,Z,U),U,V) = c_List_Oappend(c_List_Omap(X,Y,U,V),c_List_Omap(X,Z,U,V),V),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_map__append_0) ).

cnf(cls_rev__map_0,axiom,
    c_List_Orev(c_List_Omap(X,Y,Z,U),U) = c_List_Omap(X,c_List_Orev(Y,Z),Z,U),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_rev__map_0) ).

cnf(cls_map__is__Nil__conv_1,axiom,
    c_List_Omap(X,c_List_Olist_ONil(Y),Y,Z) = c_List_Olist_ONil(Z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_map__is__Nil__conv_1) ).

cnf(cls_COMBC__def_0,axiom,
    hAPP(c_COMBC(X,Y,Z,U,V),W) = hAPP(hAPP(X,W),Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_COMBC__def_0) ).

cnf(cls_map__eq__Cons__conv_3,axiom,
    c_List_Omap(X,c_List_Olist_OCons(Y,Z,U),U,V) = c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(X,Y),c_List_Omap(X,Z,U,V),V),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_map__eq__Cons__conv_3) ).

cnf(345,plain,
    c_List_Omap(X,c_List_Olist_OCons(Y,Z,U),U,V) = c_List_Orev(c_List_Oappend(c_List_Orev(c_List_Omap(X,Z,U,V),V),c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(X,Y),c_List_Olist_ONil(V),V),V),V),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_map__eq__Cons__conv_3,cls_rev__eq__Cons__iff_1,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
    c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Olift,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_b____),v_u____),v_i____)),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_bs____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

cnf(350,plain,
    c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Orev(c_List_Oappend(c_List_Orev(c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_bs____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Olift,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_b____),v_u____),v_i____)),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_CHAINED_0,cls_rev__eq__Cons__iff_1,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Olist_OCons(v_b____,v_bs____,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(352,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0,350,cls_rev__singleton__conv_1,cls_eq__Nil__appendI_0,cls_rev__is__Nil__conv_1,cls_map__is__Nil__conv_1,cls_map__append_0,cls_rev__map_0,cls_COMBC__def_0,345,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : LCL811-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 10:31:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-02T10:31:44
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n015.cluster.edu at 2022-07-02T10:31:44
% 0.41/0.59  WARNING:
% 0.41/0.59     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__1__no__zero__divisors| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.41/0.59  WARNING:
% 0.41/0.59     |class_Int_Onumber__ring| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.41/0.59  WARNING:
% 0.41/0.59     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.41/0.59  WARNING:
% 0.41/0.59     |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.41/0.59  WARNING:
% 0.41/0.59     |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add__meet| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.41/0.59  WARNING:
% 0.41/0.59     |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.47/0.65  
% 0.47/0.65  
% 0.47/0.65  #||
% 0.47/0.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.65  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.65  ||#
% 0.47/0.65  
% 0.47/0.65  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.47/0.65  ;       453 formulas have been input or derived (from 1 formulas).
% 0.47/0.65  ;       352 (78%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.47/0.65  ;           23 ( 7%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.47/0.65  ;          329 (93%) are still being kept.
% 0.47/0.65  ; 
% 0.47/0.65  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.095  51%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.012   6%   Assert                       (432 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.023  12%   Process new row              (403 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.005   3%   Condensing                   (235 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.002   1%   Forward subsumption          (235 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.003   2%   Backward subsumption         (214 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.001   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (119 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.018  10%   Forward simplification       (391 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.003   2%   Backward simplification      (337 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.005   3%   Ordering                     (424 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.001   1%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.017   9%   Other
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.185        Total
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.187        Real time
% 0.47/0.65  ; 
% 0.47/0.65  ; Term-hash-array has 1,057 terms in all.
% 0.47/0.65  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 210 entries (210 at peak, 214 added, 4 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,009 nodes (1,009 at peak, 1,053 added, 44 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65  ;  Retrieved 86 possibly forward subsuming rows in 235 calls.
% 0.47/0.65  ;  Retrieved 58 possibly backward subsumed rows in 214 calls.
% 0.47/0.65  ; Path-index has 1,036 entries (1,036 at peak, 1,083 added, 47 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65  ; Path-index has 5,074 nodes (5,074 at peak, 5,166 added, 92 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65  ; Trie-index has 1,036 entries (1,036 at peak, 1,083 added, 47 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65  ; Trie-index has 5,038 nodes (5,038 at peak, 5,226 added, 188 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65  ; Retrieved 287 generalization terms in 1,552 calls.
% 0.47/0.65  ; Retrieved 237 instance terms in 167 calls.
% 0.47/0.65  ; 
% 0.47/0.65  ; The agenda of input rows to process has 26 entries:
% 0.47/0.65  ;    26 with value 0
% 0.47/0.65  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 6 entries:
% 0.47/0.65  ;     6 with value 0
% 0.47/0.65  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 328 entries:
% 0.47/0.65  ;     1 with value 4              23 with value 19               6 with value 32
% 0.47/0.65  ;     4 with value 6              11 with value 20               8 with value 33
% 0.47/0.65  ;     3 with value 7              19 with value 21               5 with value 34
% 0.47/0.66  ;     4 with value 8              13 with value 22               2 with value 35
% 0.47/0.66  ;     5 with value 9               9 with value 23               3 with value 36
% 0.47/0.66  ;     8 with value 10             10 with value 24               1 with value 38
% 0.47/0.66  ;    19 with value 11              9 with value 25               1 with value 40
% 0.47/0.66  ;    17 with value 12             11 with value 26               1 with value 42
% 0.47/0.66  ;    16 with value 13              4 with value 27               4 with value 43
% 0.47/0.66  ;    19 with value 14             10 with value 28               1 with value 47
% 0.47/0.66  ;    24 with value 15              4 with value 29               1 with value 48
% 0.47/0.66  ;    16 with value 16              4 with value 30               1 with value 61
% 0.47/0.66  ;     9 with value 17              3 with value 31               1 with value 77
% 0.47/0.66  ;    18 with value 18
% 0.47/0.66  Evaluation took:
% 0.47/0.66    0.188 seconds of real time
% 0.47/0.66    0.174385 seconds of user run time
% 0.47/0.66    0.013561 seconds of system run time
% 0.47/0.66    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.47/0.66    0 page faults and
% 0.47/0.66    11,826,576 bytes consed.
% 0.47/0.66  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.66  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-02T10:31:44
% 0.47/0.66  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.66  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------