TSTP Solution File: LCL807-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : LCL807-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:34:27 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
( v_thesis____
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(tc_Type_Otype),v_e____),v_i____),v_T____)),v_b____),X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.HsVwVoIVxy/E---3.1_385.p',cls_that_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.HsVwVoIVxy/E---3.1_385.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Cons_Ohyps_I1_J_1,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(tc_Type_Otype),v_e____),v_i____),v_T____)),v_b____),v_sko__local__XCons__Xhyps__1__1(v_T____,v_b____,v_e____,v_i____))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.HsVwVoIVxy/E---3.1_385.p',cls_Cons_Ohyps_I1_J_1) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( v_thesis____
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(tc_Type_Otype),v_e____),v_i____),v_T____)),v_b____),X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_that_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( v_thesis____
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(tc_Type_Otype),v_e____),v_i____),v_T____)),v_b____),X1)) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(tc_Type_Otype),v_e____),v_i____),v_T____)),v_b____),v_sko__local__XCons__Xhyps__1__1(v_T____,v_b____,v_e____,v_i____))),
cls_Cons_Ohyps_I1_J_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(tc_Type_Otype),v_e____),v_i____),v_T____)),v_b____),X1)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : LCL807-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 09:23:27 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.51 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.HsVwVoIVxy/E---3.1_385.p
% 0.21/0.54 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 491 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.21/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.54 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.54 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.54 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.54 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54 # Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 517 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.21/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.54 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.54 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.54 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.54 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.54
% 0.21/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.54 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 273
% 0.21/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Initial clauses : 273
% 0.21/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 273
% 0.21/0.54 # Processed clauses : 37
% 0.21/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # ...subsumed : 5
% 0.21/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 31
% 0.21/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 31
% 0.21/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 23
% 0.21/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 236
% 0.21/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 520
% 0.21/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.21/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.21/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.21/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9953
% 0.21/0.54 # Search garbage collected termcells : 549
% 0.21/0.54
% 0.21/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.21/0.54 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.54 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.21/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 2312 pages
% 0.21/0.54
% 0.21/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54 # User time : 0.042 s
% 0.21/0.54 # System time : 0.018 s
% 0.21/0.54 # Total time : 0.060 s
% 0.21/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1988 pages
% 0.21/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------