TSTP Solution File: LCL795-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : LCL795-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:53:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 2 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 9 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_T_H_H____,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(v_u____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_T_0,axiom,
v_T____ = hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_T_0) ).
cnf(cls_lift__type_0,axiom,
( c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(X4,X2),X5)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X1,X4,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_lift__type_0) ).
cnf(cls_uT_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_uT_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_T_H_H____,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(v_u____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_T_H_H____,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(v_u____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
v_T____ = hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)),
cls_T_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(X4,X2),X5)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X1,X4,X5) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_lift__type_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_T_H_H____,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(v_u____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_T____),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(X4,X2),X5)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X1,X4,X5) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
cls_uT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : LCL795-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon May 20 03:09:52 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.55 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.15/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.15/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.55 # new_bool_3 with pid 13324 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.15/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.55 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.55 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.15/0.55 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 45s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.55 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 13327 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.15/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.15/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.55 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.55 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.15/0.55 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 45s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/0.55
% 0.15/0.55 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.55 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 920
% 0.15/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 553
% 0.15/0.55 # Initial clauses : 367
% 0.15/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 367
% 0.15/0.55 # Processed clauses : 376
% 0.15/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 31
% 0.15/0.55 # ...subsumed : 67
% 0.15/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 278
% 0.15/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.15/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.15/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.15/0.55 # Generated clauses : 4105
% 0.15/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3537
% 0.15/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.15/0.55 # Paramodulations : 4072
% 0.15/0.55 # Factorizations : 4
% 0.15/0.55 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 29
% 0.15/0.55 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 1803
% 0.15/0.55 # ...of those cached : 1365
% 0.15/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 270
% 0.15/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 61
% 0.15/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 0.15/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 16
% 0.15/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 188
% 0.15/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3528
% 0.15/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 8675
% 0.15/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.15/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7035
% 0.15/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6542
% 0.15/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 51
% 0.15/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 394
% 0.15/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 88
% 0.15/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 31
% 0.15/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 93641
% 0.15/0.55 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2547
% 0.15/0.55
% 0.15/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.55 # User time : 0.101 s
% 0.15/0.55 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.55 # Total time : 0.109 s
% 0.15/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 2864 pages
% 0.15/0.55
% 0.15/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.55 # User time : 0.223 s
% 0.15/0.55 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.55 # Total time : 0.235 s
% 0.15/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 2320 pages
% 0.15/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.56 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------