TSTP Solution File: LCL792-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : LCL792-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:34:23 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.48s 0.68s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(v_u____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3eOs9SyjRw/E---3.1_25944.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_lift__IT_0,axiom,
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(X1,X2))
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3eOs9SyjRw/E---3.1_25944.p',cls_lift__IT_0) ).
cnf(cls_uIT_0,axiom,
c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3eOs9SyjRw/E---3.1_25944.p',cls_uIT_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(v_u____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(X1,X2))
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_lift__IT_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(v_u____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(X1,X2))
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____),
cls_uIT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : LCL792-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 09:28:51 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.39/0.62 Running first-order model finding
% 0.39/0.62 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3eOs9SyjRw/E---3.1_25944.p
% 0.48/0.68 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.48/0.68 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.48/0.68 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.48/0.68 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.48/0.68 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.68 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.68 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.68 # new_bool_3 with pid 26105 completed with status 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.48/0.68 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.48/0.68 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.48/0.68 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.48/0.68 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.68 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.48/0.68 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.48/0.68 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.48/0.68 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.68 # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 26108 completed with status 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.48/0.68 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.48/0.68 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.48/0.68 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.48/0.68 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.68 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.48/0.68 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.48/0.68 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.48/0.68 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.68 # Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.48/0.68
% 0.48/0.68 # Proof found!
% 0.48/0.68 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.48/0.68 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.48/0.68 # Parsed axioms : 1229
% 0.48/0.68 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 935
% 0.48/0.68 # Initial clauses : 294
% 0.48/0.68 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Initial clauses in saturation : 294
% 0.48/0.68 # Processed clauses : 21
% 0.48/0.68 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.48/0.68 # ...subsumed : 7
% 0.48/0.68 # ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.48/0.68 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.48/0.68 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.48/0.68 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.48/0.68 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # NegExts : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.48/0.68 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.48/0.68 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.48/0.68 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.48/0.68 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.48/0.68 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.48/0.68 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.48/0.68 # Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.48/0.68 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.48/0.68 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.48/0.68 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.48/0.68 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 273
% 0.48/0.68 # ...number of literals in the above : 551
% 0.48/0.68 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.48/0.68 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.48/0.68 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.48/0.68 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.48/0.68 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.48/0.68 # Termbank termtop insertions : 17518
% 0.48/0.68 # Search garbage collected termcells : 3796
% 0.48/0.68
% 0.48/0.68 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.68 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.48/0.68 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.48/0.68 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.48/0.68 # Maximum resident set size: 2912 pages
% 0.48/0.68
% 0.48/0.68 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.68 # User time : 0.045 s
% 0.48/0.68 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.48/0.68 # Total time : 0.055 s
% 0.48/0.68 # Maximum resident set size: 2540 pages
% 0.48/0.68 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------