TSTP Solution File: LCL789-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : LCL789-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 00:03:42 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    8 (   2 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_T_0,axiom,
    v_T____ = hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_T_0) ).

cnf(cls_uT_0,axiom,
    c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_uT_0) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))),
    c_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    v_T____ = hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)),
    cls_T_0 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
    cls_uT_0 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.13  % Problem    : LCL789-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.09/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 03:17:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.51  Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.55  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.22/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 32729 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.22/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.55  # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.55  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 32735 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.22/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.55  # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.55  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.55  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.55  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.55  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.55  # Parsed axioms                        : 321
% 0.22/0.55  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Initial clauses                      : 321
% 0.22/0.55  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 321
% 0.22/0.55  # Processed clauses                    : 5
% 0.22/0.55  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.22/0.55  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # ...remaining for further processing  : 4
% 0.22/0.55  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.22/0.55  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.22/0.55  # ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.22/0.55  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  # Current number of processed clauses  : 3
% 0.22/0.55  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.22/0.55  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.55  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.55  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 316
% 0.22/0.55  # ...number of literals in the above   : 572
% 0.22/0.55  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.22/0.55  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.22/0.55  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.22/0.55  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6905
% 0.22/0.55  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 529
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.55  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.55  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.22/0.55  # Maximum resident set size: 2336 pages
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55  # User time                : 0.035 s
% 0.22/0.55  # System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.22/0.55  # Total time               : 0.050 s
% 0.22/0.55  # Maximum resident set size: 1944 pages
% 0.22/0.55  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------