TSTP Solution File: LCL762-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : LCL762-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:53:22 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 2 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_foldl__Nil_0,axiom,
c_List_Ofoldl(X1,X2,c_List_Olist_ONil(X3),X4,X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_foldl__Nil_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_List_Ofoldl(X1,X2,c_List_Olist_ONil(X3),X4,X3) = X2,
cls_foldl__Nil_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n))),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL762-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.14/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 00:42:07 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.51 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # new_bool_1 with pid 2718 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: FGUSM-FFLF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # partial match(2): FGHSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I with pid 2721 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: FGUSM-FFLF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # partial match(2): FGHSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 422
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 310
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses : 112
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 112
% 0.21/0.51 # Processed clauses : 133
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 20
% 0.21/0.51 # ...subsumed : 17
% 0.21/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 96
% 0.21/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.21/0.51 # Generated clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.21/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.21/0.51 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 22
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of those cached : 3
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 21
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 52
% 0.21/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 101
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 75
% 0.21/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 334
% 0.21/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 307
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.21/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
% 0.21/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 40
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6540
% 0.21/0.51 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1547
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 2276 pages
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.024 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.028 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 2032 pages
% 0.21/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------