TSTP Solution File: LCL684+1.001 by PyRes---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : LCL684+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:32:11 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : LCL684+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed May  8 14:39:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.52  % Version:  1.5
% 0.21/0.52  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.52  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.21/0.52  fof(main,conjecture,(~(?[X]:(~((~(![Y]:((~r1(X,Y))|(![X]:((~r1(Y,X))|(~(p201(X)&p101(X))))))))|(~(p201(X)&p101(X))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', main)).
% 0.21/0.52  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(~(?[X]:(~((~(![Y]:((~r1(X,Y))|(![X]:((~r1(Y,X))|(~(p201(X)&p101(X))))))))|(~(p201(X)&p101(X)))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[main])).
% 0.21/0.52  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(~(~(?[X]:(~((~(![Y]:(~r1(X,Y)|(![X]:(~r1(Y,X)|(~(p201(X)&p101(X))))))))|(~(p201(X)&p101(X)))))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c0])).
% 0.21/0.52  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(?[X]:((![Y]:(~r1(X,Y)|(![X]:(~r1(Y,X)|(~p201(X)|~p101(X))))))&(p201(X)&p101(X)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c1])).
% 0.21/0.52  fof(c3,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:((![X3]:(~r1(X2,X3)|(![X4]:(~r1(X3,X4)|(~p201(X4)|~p101(X4))))))&(p201(X2)&p101(X2)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c2])).
% 0.21/0.52  fof(c5,negated_conjecture,(![X3]:(![X4]:((~r1(skolem0001,X3)|(~r1(X3,X4)|(~p201(X4)|~p101(X4))))&(p201(skolem0001)&p101(skolem0001))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c4,negated_conjecture,((![X3]:(~r1(skolem0001,X3)|(![X4]:(~r1(X3,X4)|(~p201(X4)|~p101(X4))))))&(p201(skolem0001)&p101(skolem0001))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c3])).])).
% 0.21/0.52  cnf(c7,negated_conjecture,p201(skolem0001),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.21/0.52  cnf(c8,negated_conjecture,p101(skolem0001),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.21/0.52  fof(reflexivity,axiom,(![X]:r1(X,X)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', reflexivity)).
% 0.21/0.52  fof(c12,plain,(![X8]:r1(X8,X8)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity])).
% 0.21/0.52  cnf(c13,plain,r1(X9,X9),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c12])).
% 0.21/0.52  cnf(c6,negated_conjecture,~r1(skolem0001,X14)|~r1(X14,X15)|~p201(X15)|~p101(X15),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.21/0.52  cnf(c17,plain,~r1(skolem0001,X18)|~p201(X18)|~p101(X18),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c6, c13])).
% 0.21/0.52  cnf(c18,plain,~p201(skolem0001)|~p101(skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c17, c13])).
% 0.21/0.52  cnf(c19,plain,~p201(skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c18, c8])).
% 0.21/0.52  cnf(c20,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c19, c7])).
% 0.21/0.52  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  % Initial clauses    : 5
% 0.21/0.52  % Processed clauses  : 8
% 0.21/0.52  % Factors computed   : 2
% 0.21/0.52  % Resolvents computed: 5
% 0.21/0.52  % Tautologies deleted: 2
% 0.21/0.52  % Forward subsumed   : 0
% 0.21/0.52  % Backward subsumed  : 1
% 0.21/0.52  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.21/0.52  % User time          : 0.154 s
% 0.21/0.52  % System time        : 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.52  % Total time         : 0.167 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------