TSTP Solution File: LCL684+1.001 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : LCL684+1.001 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 00:03:19 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 46 ( 26 ~; 14 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(main,conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
~ ( ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| ~ ( p201(X1)
& p101(X1) ) ) )
| ~ ( p201(X1)
& p101(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',main) ).
fof(reflexivity,axiom,
! [X1] : r1(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ? [X1] :
~ ( ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| ~ ( p201(X1)
& p101(X1) ) ) )
| ~ ( p201(X1)
& p101(X1) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[main])]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X9,X10] :
( ( ~ r1(esk1_0,X9)
| ~ r1(X9,X10)
| ~ p201(X10)
| ~ p101(X10) )
& p201(esk1_0)
& p101(esk1_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X4] : r1(X4,X4),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r1(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ~ p201(X2)
| ~ p101(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
r1(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p101(X1)
| ~ p201(X1)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
p101(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
p201(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10 % Problem : LCL684+1.001 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Mon May 20 01:19:52 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.43 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 5412 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.43 # Search class: FHHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 5416 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.43 # Search class: FHHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.16/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.16/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.16/0.43 # Processed clauses : 10
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 0.16/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.16/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.16/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.16/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.16/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 353
% 0.16/0.43 # Search garbage collected termcells : 64
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1664 pages
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.16/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------