TSTP Solution File: LCL682+1.001 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LCL682+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:39:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : LCL682+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 00:53:15 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS derived 51 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 67 clauses.
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS allocated 85127 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 6 :
% 0.19/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.44  3[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skc14,skc15)*l.
% 0.19/0.44  4[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skc9,skc14)*l.
% 0.19/0.44  11[0:Inp] || p12(skc15)*+ -> .
% 0.19/0.44  15[0:Inp] || r1(u,v)*+ r1(skc9,u)* -> p12(v)*.
% 0.19/0.44  90[0:Res:3.0,15.0] || r1(skc9,skc14) -> p12(skc15)*.
% 0.19/0.44  107[0:MRR:90.0,90.1,4.0,11.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.44  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : main
% 0.19/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------