TSTP Solution File: LCL682+1.001 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : LCL682+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:16:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 1.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 75 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 24 ( 8 avg)
% Number of connectives : 125 ( 59 ~; 51 |; 15 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 22 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 9 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 0 sgn 31 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(main,conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
~ ( ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ~ ( ~ ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p16(X1) )
| ~ ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p12(X1) )
| ~ ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p14(X1) )
| ~ ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p12(X1) ) ) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p15(X1) ) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p13(X1) ) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p12(X1) ) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p11(X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',main) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ? [X1] :
~ ( ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ~ ( ~ ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p16(X1) )
| ~ ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p12(X1) )
| ~ ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p14(X1) )
| ~ ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p12(X1) ) ) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p15(X1) ) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p13(X1) ) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p12(X1) ) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| p11(X1) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[main]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( ~ r1(X4,X5)
| p16(X5)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X4) )
& ( ~ r1(X4,X6)
| p12(X6)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X4) )
& ( ~ r1(X4,X7)
| p14(X7)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X4) )
& ( ~ r1(X4,X8)
| p12(X8)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X4) )
& r1(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& r1(esk2_0,esk3_0)
& ~ p15(esk3_0)
& r1(esk1_0,esk4_0)
& r1(esk4_0,esk5_0)
& ~ p13(esk5_0)
& r1(esk1_0,esk6_0)
& r1(esk6_0,esk7_0)
& ~ p12(esk7_0)
& r1(esk1_0,esk8_0)
& r1(esk8_0,esk9_0)
& ~ p11(esk9_0) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( p12(X2)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ r1(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
r1(esk1_0,esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ p12(esk7_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( p12(X1)
| ~ r1(esk6_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
r1(esk6_0,esk7_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : LCL682+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 00:49:48 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/1.39 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.20/1.39 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.20/1.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.20/1.39
% 0.20/1.39 # Proof found!
% 0.20/1.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/1.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/1.39 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 0.20/1.39 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.20/1.39 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 0.20/1.39 # Proof object conjectures : 9
% 0.20/1.39 # Proof object clause conjectures : 6
% 0.20/1.39 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.20/1.39 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.20/1.39 # Proof object initial formulas used : 1
% 0.20/1.39 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.20/1.39 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.20/1.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.20/1.39 # Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.20/1.39 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Initial clauses : 18
% 0.20/1.39 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 0.20/1.39 # Processed clauses : 28
% 0.20/1.39 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.20/1.39 # ...remaining for further processing : 27
% 0.20/1.39 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Generated clauses : 27
% 0.20/1.39 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 25
% 0.20/1.39 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Paramodulations : 27
% 0.20/1.39 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Current number of processed clauses : 27
% 0.20/1.39 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.20/1.39 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.20/1.39 # Non-unit-clauses : 13
% 0.20/1.39 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15
% 0.20/1.39 # ...number of literals in the above : 29
% 0.20/1.39 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 30
% 0.20/1.39 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 0.20/1.39 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.20/1.39 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.20/1.39 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/1.39 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1176
% 0.20/1.39
% 0.20/1.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/1.39 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.20/1.39 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/1.39 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.20/1.39 # Maximum resident set size: 2768 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------