TSTP Solution File: LCL680+1.001 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : LCL680+1.001 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 00:21:30 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.53s 0.71s
% Output   : Refutation 0.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (  14   ~;   3   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   0   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f7,f8]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ~ p1(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ~ p1(sK0)
    & p1(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f4,f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ~ p1(X0)
        & p1(X0) )
   => ( ~ p1(sK0)
      & p1(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ~ p1(X0)
      & p1(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ~ ( p1(X0)
        | ~ p1(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ? [X0] :
          ~ ( p1(X0)
            | ~ p1(X0) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0] :
        ~ ( p1(X0)
          | ~ p1(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',main) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    p1(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : LCL680+1.001 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 02:24:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.34  This is a FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ problem
% 0.13/0.34  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/0.71  % (16170)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.53/0.71  % (16171)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.53/0.71  % (16172)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.53/0.71  % (16173)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.53/0.71  % (16169)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.53/0.71  % (16170)First to succeed.
% 0.53/0.71  % (16170)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-16167"
% 0.53/0.71  % (16172)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.53/0.71  % (16171)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.53/0.71  % (16173)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.53/0.71  % (16168)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.53/0.71  % (16169)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.53/0.71  % (16175)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.53/0.71  % (16170)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.53/0.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.71  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.53/0.71  % (16170)------------------------------
% 0.53/0.71  % (16170)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.53/0.71  % (16170)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.53/0.71  
% 0.53/0.71  % (16170)Memory used [KB]: 952
% 0.53/0.71  % (16170)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.53/0.71  % (16170)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.53/0.71  % (16167)Success in time 0.364 s
% 0.53/0.71  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------