%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LCL678+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:39:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : LCL678+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 07:02:30 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.45  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS derived 8 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 13 clauses.
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS allocated 85108 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS spent	0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.02 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 :
% 0.21/0.45  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.45  2[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf2(u))*r.
% 0.21/0.45  3[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf2(u),skf3(u))*l.
% 0.21/0.45  4[0:Inp] || p1(skf3(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> .
% 0.21/0.45  5[0:Inp] || r1(skc1,u) r1(skf2(u),v)*+ -> p1(v)*.
% 0.21/0.45  6[0:Inp] || r1(u,v)* r1(v,w)* -> r1(u,w)*.
% 0.21/0.45  7[0:OCh:6.1,6.0,3.0,2.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf3(u))*r.
% 0.21/0.45  11[0:Res:3.0,5.1] || r1(skc1,u) -> p1(skf3(u))*.
% 0.21/0.45  15[0:MRR:11.1,4.0] || r1(skc1,u)* -> .
% 0.21/0.45  16[0:UnC:15.0,7.0] ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.45  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.45  Formulae used in the proof : main reflexivity transitivity
% 0.21/0.45  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------