TSTP Solution File: LCL678+1.001 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : LCL678+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:59:02 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 5 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 35 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 57 ( 33 ~; 21 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 4 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 1 sgn; 12 !; 2 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
r1: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
p1: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
esk2_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
esk3_1: $i > $i ).
fof(main,conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
~ ( ~ $true
| ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ~ $true
| ~ ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p1(X2) )
| ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p1(X2) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',main) ).
fof(reflexivity,axiom,
! [X1] : r1(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ? [X1] :
~ ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| ~ ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X2,X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p1(X2) )
| ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p1(X2) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[main])]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X9,X12] :
( ( r1(X9,esk2_1(X9))
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X9) )
& ( r1(esk2_1(X9),esk3_1(X9))
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X9) )
& ( ~ p1(esk3_1(X9))
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X9) )
& ( ~ r1(esk2_1(X9),X12)
| p1(X12)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( p1(X2)
| ~ r1(esk2_1(X1),X2)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( r1(esk2_1(X1),esk3_1(X1))
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p1(esk3_1(X1))
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X4] : r1(X4,X4),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ r1(esk1_0,X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
r1(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL678+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 20:33:21 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.55 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.56 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.18/0.56 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.56 % Proof found
% 0.18/0.56 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.56 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.57 % Total time : 0.004000 s
% 0.18/0.57 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.18/0.57 % Total time : 0.007000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------