TSTP Solution File: LCL648+1.001 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : LCL648+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:49:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.50s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 76 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 112 ( 53 ~; 27 |; 30 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 15 !; 14 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f17,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f16,f13]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
p201(sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
( r1(sK0,sK1)
& p201(sK1)
& p101(sK1)
& ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(sK0,X2)
| ~ p101(X2)
| ~ p201(X2) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f7,f9,f8]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
( ? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( r1(X0,X1)
& p201(X1)
& p101(X1) )
& ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X0,X2)
| ~ p101(X2)
| ~ p201(X2) ) )
=> ( ? [X1] :
( r1(sK0,X1)
& p201(X1)
& p101(X1) )
& ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(sK0,X2)
| ~ p101(X2)
| ~ p201(X2) ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
( ? [X1] :
( r1(sK0,X1)
& p201(X1)
& p101(X1) )
=> ( r1(sK0,sK1)
& p201(sK1)
& p101(sK1) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( r1(X0,X1)
& p201(X1)
& p101(X1) )
& ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X0,X2)
| ~ p101(X2)
| ~ p201(X2) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X2] :
( r1(X0,X2)
& p201(X2)
& p101(X2) )
& ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X0,X1)
| ~ p101(X1)
| ~ p201(X1) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
? [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X0,X1)
| ~ p201(X1)
| ~ p101(X1) )
& ? [X2] :
( r1(X0,X2)
& p201(X2)
& p101(X2) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
? [X0] :
~ ( ~ ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X0,X1)
| ~ ( p201(X1)
& p101(X1) ) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X0,X2)
| ~ ( p201(X2)
& p101(X2) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,plain,
~ ~ ? [X0] :
~ ( ~ ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X0,X1)
| ~ ( p201(X1)
& p101(X1) ) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X0,X2)
| ~ ( p201(X2)
& p101(X2) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ? [X0] :
~ ( ~ ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X0,X1)
| ~ ( p201(X1)
& p101(X1) ) )
| ! [X1] :
( ~ ( p201(X1)
& p101(X1) )
| ~ r1(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
~ ? [X0] :
~ ( ~ ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X0,X1)
| ~ ( p201(X1)
& p101(X1) ) )
| ! [X1] :
( ~ ( p201(X1)
& p101(X1) )
| ~ r1(X0,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',main) ).
fof(f16,plain,
~ p201(sK1),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f15,f14]) ).
fof(f14,plain,
r1(sK0,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
( ~ r1(sK0,sK1)
| ~ p201(sK1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f11,f12]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
p101(sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ p101(X2)
| ~ r1(sK0,X2)
| ~ p201(X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : LCL648+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 02:36:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.49 % (6633)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/467Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (6624)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/68Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (6633)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.50 % (6615)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/48Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (6618)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (6617)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/7Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (6623)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/99Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (6631)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/138Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (6631)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.19/0.50 % (6633)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50 % (6633)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50 % (6633)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.50 % (6633)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.50 % (6633)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 % (6633)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.19/0.50 % (6633)Time elapsed: 0.065 s
% 0.19/0.50 % (6633)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.50 % (6633)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50 % (6633)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50 % (6609)Success in time 0.161 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------