TSTP Solution File: LCL645-10.001 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : LCL645-10.001 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:49:01 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 0.19s 0.48s
% Output : Saturation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_9)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
c_0_9,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom_001,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
ifeq2(r1(sK1_main_Y,X1),true,p1(X1),true) = true,
main_3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
ifeq2(r1(sK2_main_Y,X1),true,p1(X1),true) = true,
main_2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
ifeq(p1(sK1_main_Y),true,a,b) = b,
main_5,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
ifeq(p1(sK2_main_Y),true,a,b) = b,
main_4,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
r1(sK3_main_X,sK1_main_Y) = true,
main_1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
r1(sK3_main_X,sK2_main_Y) = true,
main,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL645-10.001 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 03:04:08 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # new_bool_3 with pid 32235 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # partial match(1): FUUPM-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 32240 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # partial match(1): FUUPM-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # No proof found!
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.19/0.48 # Processed clauses : 18
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 18
% 0.19/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.19/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 154
% 0.19/0.48 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.19/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------