TSTP Solution File: LCL641+1.001 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : LCL641+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:24:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.44s 0.60s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : LCL641+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 2 16:23:05 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.47 *
% 0.21/0.47 *
% 0.21/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.47 *
% 0.21/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.47 *
% 0.21/0.48 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.48 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.48 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.48 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.48 *
% 0.21/0.48 "."
% 0.21/0.48 *
% 0.21/0.48 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-02T16:23:05
% 0.21/0.48 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n026.cluster.edu at 2022-07-02T16:23:05
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?X is being rebound.
% 0.21/0.49 WARNING: In quantification, variable ?Y is being rebound.
% 0.44/0.59
% 0.44/0.59
% 0.44/0.59 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.44/0.59 ; 80 formulas have been input or derived (from 66 formulas).
% 0.44/0.59 ; 69 (86%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.44/0.59 ; 10 (14%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.44/0.59 ; 59 (86%) are still being kept.
% 0.44/0.59 ;
% 0.44/0.59 ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.004 3% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.006 5% Assert (1 call)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.008 7% Process new row (79 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.055 47% Resolution (132 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (66 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (7 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.013 11% Condensing (73 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.002 2% Forward subsumption (73 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.004 3% Backward subsumption (63 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (52 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.001 1% Forward simplification (79 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.000 0% Backward simplification (69 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.001 1% Ordering (34 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.001 1% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.022 19% Other
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.117 Total
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.117 Real time
% 0.44/0.59 ;
% 0.44/0.59 ; Term-hash-array has 89 terms in all.
% 0.44/0.59 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 53 entries (62 at peak, 63 added, 10 deleted).
% 0.44/0.59 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 188 nodes (257 at peak, 258 added, 70 deleted).
% 0.44/0.59 ; Retrieved 53 possibly forward subsuming rows in 73 calls.
% 0.44/0.59 ; Retrieved 9 possibly backward subsumed rows in 63 calls.
% 0.44/0.59 ; Path-index has 74 entries (93 at peak, 94 added, 20 deleted).
% 0.44/0.59 ; Path-index has 117 nodes (139 at peak, 140 added, 23 deleted).
% 0.44/0.59 ; Trie-index has 74 entries (93 at peak, 94 added, 20 deleted).
% 0.44/0.59 ; Trie-index has 116 nodes (151 at peak, 152 added, 36 deleted).
% 0.44/0.59 ; Retrieved 4 generalization terms in 93 calls.
% 0.44/0.59 ; Retrieved 6 instance terms in 6 calls.
% 0.44/0.59 ; Retrieved 54,754 unifiable terms in 7,198 calls.
% 0.44/0.59 ;
% 0.44/0.59 ; All agendas are empty.
% 0.44/0.59 Evaluation took:
% 0.44/0.59 0.118 seconds of real time
% 0.44/0.59 0.111324 seconds of user run time
% 0.44/0.59 0.006234 seconds of system run time
% 0.44/0.59 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.44/0.59 0 page faults and
% 0.44/0.59 5,990,032 bytes consed.
% 0.44/0.59
% 0.44/0.59 #||
% 0.44/0.59 % SZS status GaveUp for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.59 ||#
% 0.44/0.59 :AGENDA-EMPTY
% 0.44/0.59 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-02T16:23:05
% 0.44/0.59 :AGENDA-EMPTY
% 0.44/0.59 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------