TSTP Solution File: LCL529+1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : LCL529+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:38:07 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.46s 1.15s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 42 ( 19 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 70 ( 5 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 53 ( 25 ~; 18 |; 0 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 5 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 3 sgn 22 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,axiom,
( and_1
<=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_1) ).
fof(f40,axiom,
and_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_and_1) ).
fof(f50,axiom,
( necessitation
<=> ! [X0] :
( is_a_theorem(X0)
=> is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',necessitation) ).
fof(f64,axiom,
( axiom_m2
<=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_m2) ).
fof(f75,axiom,
( op_strict_implies
=> ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_strict_implies) ).
fof(f78,axiom,
necessitation,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',km5_necessitation) ).
fof(f85,axiom,
op_strict_implies,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).
fof(f88,conjecture,
axiom_m2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_axiom_m2) ).
fof(f89,negated_conjecture,
~ axiom_m2,
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f88]) ).
fof(f104,plain,
~ axiom_m2,
inference(flattening,[],[f89]) ).
fof(f105,plain,
( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
=> axiom_m2 ),
inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f64]) ).
fof(f109,plain,
( necessitation
=> ! [X0] :
( is_a_theorem(X0)
=> is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ) ),
inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f50]) ).
fof(f118,plain,
( and_1
=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f136,plain,
( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
| ~ and_1 ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).
fof(f148,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0) )
| ~ necessitation ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).
fof(f152,plain,
( axiom_m2
| ? [X0,X1] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f105]) ).
fof(f154,plain,
( ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
| ~ op_strict_implies ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).
fof(f156,plain,
( ? [X0,X1] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
=> ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0)) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f157,plain,
( axiom_m2
| ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0)) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f152,f156]) ).
fof(f164,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
| ~ and_1 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f136]) ).
fof(f184,plain,
and_1,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).
fof(f194,plain,
! [X0] :
( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| ~ necessitation ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f148]) ).
fof(f198,plain,
( axiom_m2
| ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f157]) ).
fof(f200,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
| ~ op_strict_implies ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f154]) ).
fof(f203,plain,
necessitation,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).
fof(f209,plain,
op_strict_implies,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).
fof(f212,plain,
~ axiom_m2,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f104]) ).
cnf(c_55,plain,
( ~ and_1
| is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f164]) ).
cnf(c_75,plain,
and_1,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f184]) ).
cnf(c_85,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| ~ necessitation
| is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f194]) ).
cnf(c_89,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0))
| axiom_m2 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f198]) ).
cnf(c_91,plain,
( ~ op_strict_implies
| necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) = strict_implies(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f200]) ).
cnf(c_94,plain,
necessitation,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f203]) ).
cnf(c_100,plain,
op_strict_implies,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f209]) ).
cnf(c_103,negated_conjecture,
~ axiom_m2,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f212]) ).
cnf(c_131,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0)),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_103,c_89]) ).
cnf(c_133,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_94,c_85]) ).
cnf(c_144,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_75,c_55]) ).
cnf(c_163,plain,
necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) = strict_implies(X0,X1),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_91,c_100,c_91]) ).
cnf(c_656,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
| is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X0,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_163,c_133]) ).
cnf(c_703,plain,
is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_144,c_656]) ).
cnf(c_718,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_131,c_703]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : LCL529+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 2 19:12:48 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ iProver source info
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.46/1.15 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.46/1.15 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Parsing...
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 3 sf_s rm: 27 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Proving...
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 clauses 26
% 0.46/1.15 conjectures 0
% 0.46/1.15 EPR 0
% 0.46/1.15 Horn 26
% 0.46/1.15 unary 23
% 0.46/1.15 binary 2
% 0.46/1.15 lits 30
% 0.46/1.15 lits eq 7
% 0.46/1.15 fd_pure 0
% 0.46/1.15 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.46/1.15 fd_cond 0
% 0.46/1.15 fd_pseudo_cond 1
% 0.46/1.15 AC symbols 0
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------
% 0.46/1.15 Current options:
% 0.46/1.15 ------
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Proving...
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------