TSTP Solution File: LCL512+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : LCL512+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:54:27 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   98
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  113 (  12 unt;  92 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  11   ~;   8   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (   6   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   34 (  32 usr;  32 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   60 (  60 usr;  55 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   2 sgn;  12   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    modus_ponens: $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    substitution_of_equivalents: $o ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    equiv: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    modus_tollens: $o ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    implies_1: $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    implies_2: $o ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    implies_3: $o ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    and_1: $o ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    and: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    and_2: $o ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    and_3: $o ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    or_1: $o ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    or: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    or_2: $o ).

tff(decl_39,type,
    or_3: $o ).

tff(decl_40,type,
    equivalence_1: $o ).

tff(decl_41,type,
    equivalence_2: $o ).

tff(decl_42,type,
    equivalence_3: $o ).

tff(decl_43,type,
    kn1: $o ).

tff(decl_44,type,
    kn2: $o ).

tff(decl_45,type,
    kn3: $o ).

tff(decl_46,type,
    cn1: $o ).

tff(decl_47,type,
    cn2: $o ).

tff(decl_48,type,
    cn3: $o ).

tff(decl_49,type,
    r1: $o ).

tff(decl_50,type,
    r2: $o ).

tff(decl_51,type,
    r3: $o ).

tff(decl_52,type,
    r4: $o ).

tff(decl_53,type,
    r5: $o ).

tff(decl_54,type,
    op_or: $o ).

tff(decl_55,type,
    op_and: $o ).

tff(decl_56,type,
    op_implies_and: $o ).

tff(decl_57,type,
    op_implies_or: $o ).

tff(decl_58,type,
    op_equiv: $o ).

tff(decl_59,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_60,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

tff(decl_61,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

tff(decl_62,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

tff(decl_63,type,
    esk5_0: $i ).

tff(decl_64,type,
    esk6_0: $i ).

tff(decl_65,type,
    esk7_0: $i ).

tff(decl_66,type,
    esk8_0: $i ).

tff(decl_67,type,
    esk9_0: $i ).

tff(decl_68,type,
    esk10_0: $i ).

tff(decl_69,type,
    esk11_0: $i ).

tff(decl_70,type,
    esk12_0: $i ).

tff(decl_71,type,
    esk13_0: $i ).

tff(decl_72,type,
    esk14_0: $i ).

tff(decl_73,type,
    esk15_0: $i ).

tff(decl_74,type,
    esk16_0: $i ).

tff(decl_75,type,
    esk17_0: $i ).

tff(decl_76,type,
    esk18_0: $i ).

tff(decl_77,type,
    esk19_0: $i ).

tff(decl_78,type,
    esk20_0: $i ).

tff(decl_79,type,
    esk21_0: $i ).

tff(decl_80,type,
    esk22_0: $i ).

tff(decl_81,type,
    esk23_0: $i ).

tff(decl_82,type,
    esk24_0: $i ).

tff(decl_83,type,
    esk25_0: $i ).

tff(decl_84,type,
    esk26_0: $i ).

tff(decl_85,type,
    esk27_0: $i ).

tff(decl_86,type,
    esk28_0: $i ).

tff(decl_87,type,
    esk29_0: $i ).

tff(decl_88,type,
    esk30_0: $i ).

tff(decl_89,type,
    esk31_0: $i ).

tff(decl_90,type,
    esk32_0: $i ).

tff(decl_91,type,
    esk33_0: $i ).

tff(decl_92,type,
    esk34_0: $i ).

tff(decl_93,type,
    esk35_0: $i ).

tff(decl_94,type,
    esk36_0: $i ).

tff(decl_95,type,
    esk37_0: $i ).

tff(decl_96,type,
    esk38_0: $i ).

tff(decl_97,type,
    esk39_0: $i ).

tff(decl_98,type,
    esk40_0: $i ).

tff(decl_99,type,
    esk41_0: $i ).

tff(decl_100,type,
    esk42_0: $i ).

tff(decl_101,type,
    esk43_0: $i ).

tff(decl_102,type,
    esk44_0: $i ).

tff(decl_103,type,
    esk45_0: $i ).

tff(decl_104,type,
    esk46_0: $i ).

tff(decl_105,type,
    esk47_0: $i ).

tff(decl_106,type,
    esk48_0: $i ).

tff(decl_107,type,
    esk49_0: $i ).

tff(decl_108,type,
    esk50_0: $i ).

tff(decl_109,type,
    esk51_0: $i ).

tff(decl_110,type,
    esk52_0: $i ).

tff(decl_111,type,
    esk53_0: $i ).

tff(decl_112,type,
    esk54_0: $i ).

tff(decl_113,type,
    esk55_0: $i ).

fof(kn2,axiom,
    ( kn2
  <=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X4,X5),X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',kn2) ).

fof(op_equiv,axiom,
    ( op_equiv
   => ! [X1,X2] : equiv(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_equiv) ).

fof(equivalence_1,axiom,
    ( equivalence_1
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X1,X2),implies(X1,X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',equivalence_1) ).

fof(hilbert_equivalence_1,conjecture,
    equivalence_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_equivalence_1) ).

fof(rosser_kn2,axiom,
    kn2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_kn2) ).

fof(rosser_op_equiv,axiom,
    op_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_op_equiv) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X73,X74] :
      ( ( ~ kn2
        | is_a_theorem(implies(and(X73,X74),X73)) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk34_0,esk35_0),esk34_0))
        | kn2 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kn2])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X125,X126] :
      ( ~ op_equiv
      | equiv(X125,X126) = and(implies(X125,X126),implies(X126,X125)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_equiv])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X59,X60] :
      ( ( ~ equivalence_1
        | is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X59,X60),implies(X59,X60))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(esk27_0,esk28_0),implies(esk27_0,esk28_0)))
        | equivalence_1 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equivalence_1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equivalence_1,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_equivalence_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1))
    | ~ kn2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    kn2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_kn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( equiv(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ op_equiv ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    op_equiv,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_op_equiv]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( equivalence_1
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(esk27_0,esk28_0),implies(esk27_0,esk28_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equivalence_1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(esk27_0,esk28_0),implies(esk27_0,esk28_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X1,X2),implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : LCL512+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 05:12:54 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.57  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.60  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.21/0.60  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.60  % Proof found
% 0.21/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.60  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.60  % Total time : 0.016000 s
% 0.21/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.60  % Total time : 0.020000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------