TSTP Solution File: LCL483+1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : LCL483+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:19:01 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  24 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (  18   ~;  14   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   0 sgn  24   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(op_implies_or,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sZiRxBnCWE/E---3.1_2523.p',op_implies_or) ).

fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sZiRxBnCWE/E---3.1_2523.p',op_implies_and) ).

fof(op_and,axiom,
    ( op_and
   => ! [X1,X2] : and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sZiRxBnCWE/E---3.1_2523.p',op_and) ).

fof(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sZiRxBnCWE/E---3.1_2523.p',principia_op_implies_or) ).

fof(r3,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X4,X5),or(X5,X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sZiRxBnCWE/E---3.1_2523.p',r3) ).

fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sZiRxBnCWE/E---3.1_2523.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

fof(principia_op_and,axiom,
    op_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sZiRxBnCWE/E---3.1_2523.p',principia_op_and) ).

fof(hilbert_modus_tollens,conjecture,
    modus_tollens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sZiRxBnCWE/E---3.1_2523.p',hilbert_modus_tollens) ).

fof(principia_r3,axiom,
    r3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sZiRxBnCWE/E---3.1_2523.p',principia_r3) ).

fof(op_or,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sZiRxBnCWE/E---3.1_2523.p',op_or) ).

fof(modus_tollens,axiom,
    ( modus_tollens
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X2),not(X1)),implies(X1,X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sZiRxBnCWE/E---3.1_2523.p',modus_tollens) ).

fof(hilbert_op_or,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sZiRxBnCWE/E---3.1_2523.p',hilbert_op_or) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X123,X124] :
      ( ~ op_implies_or
      | implies(X123,X124) = or(not(X123),X124) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_or])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X121,X122] :
      ( ~ op_implies_and
      | implies(X121,X122) = not(and(X121,not(X122))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X119,X120] :
      ( ~ op_and
      | and(X119,X120) = not(or(not(X119),not(X120))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_and])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X101,X102] :
      ( ( ~ r3
        | is_a_theorem(implies(or(X101,X102),or(X102,X101))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk48_0,esk49_0),or(esk49_0,esk48_0)))
        | r3 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r3])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2)))
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2)))
    | ~ op_and ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    op_and,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_and]) ).

fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ modus_tollens,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_modus_tollens])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ r3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    r3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r3]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X117,X118] :
      ( ~ op_or
      | or(X117,X118) = not(and(not(X117),not(X118))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_or])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    and(X1,X2) = not(implies(X1,not(X2))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( ( ~ modus_tollens
        | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X16),not(X15)),implies(X15,X16))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk6_0),not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0)))
        | modus_tollens ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_tollens])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ modus_tollens,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2)))
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    not(not(implies(X1,not(not(X2))))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_or]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( modus_tollens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk6_0),not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ modus_tollens,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    or(X1,X2) = implies(not(X1),X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_28]),c_0_33]),c_0_34])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk6_0),not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : LCL483+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 08:58:48 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sZiRxBnCWE/E---3.1_2523.p
% 0.21/0.52  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 2602 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.52  # Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 750s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting U----_207d_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # U----_207d_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2617 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Result found by U----_207d_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.52  # Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 750s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting U----_207d_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.52  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.52  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52  # Parsed axioms                        : 45
% 0.21/0.52  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Initial clauses                      : 74
% 0.21/0.52  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 74
% 0.21/0.52  # Processed clauses                    : 192
% 0.21/0.52  # ...of these trivial                  : 18
% 0.21/0.52  # ...subsumed                          : 8
% 0.21/0.52  # ...remaining for further processing  : 166
% 0.21/0.52  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.21/0.52  # Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 0.21/0.52  # Generated clauses                    : 235
% 0.21/0.52  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 202
% 0.21/0.52  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Paramodulations                      : 235
% 0.21/0.52  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Total rewrite steps                  : 148
% 0.21/0.52  # ...of those cached                   : 46
% 0.21/0.52  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of processed clauses  : 95
% 0.21/0.52  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 40
% 0.21/0.52  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.21/0.52  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.21/0.52  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 51
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 144
% 0.21/0.52  # ...number of literals in the above   : 190
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of archived clauses   : 71
% 0.21/0.52  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 280
% 0.21/0.52  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 278
% 0.21/0.52  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
% 0.21/0.52  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 60
% 0.21/0.52  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 71
% 0.21/0.52  # BW rewrite match successes           : 11
% 0.21/0.52  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 7417
% 0.21/0.52  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 1095
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.21/0.52  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Maximum resident set size: 1948 pages
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  # User time                : 0.046 s
% 0.21/0.52  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Total time               : 0.057 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
% 0.21/0.52  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.52  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------