TSTP Solution File: LCL483+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : LCL483+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:54:20 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :  102
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  126 (  19 unt;  92 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (  16   ~;  12   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (   6   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   34 (  32 usr;  32 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   60 (  60 usr;  55 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn;  20   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    modus_ponens: $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    substitution_of_equivalents: $o ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    equiv: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    modus_tollens: $o ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    implies_1: $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    implies_2: $o ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    implies_3: $o ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    and_1: $o ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    and: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    and_2: $o ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    and_3: $o ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    or_1: $o ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    or: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    or_2: $o ).

tff(decl_39,type,
    or_3: $o ).

tff(decl_40,type,
    equivalence_1: $o ).

tff(decl_41,type,
    equivalence_2: $o ).

tff(decl_42,type,
    equivalence_3: $o ).

tff(decl_43,type,
    kn1: $o ).

tff(decl_44,type,
    kn2: $o ).

tff(decl_45,type,
    kn3: $o ).

tff(decl_46,type,
    cn1: $o ).

tff(decl_47,type,
    cn2: $o ).

tff(decl_48,type,
    cn3: $o ).

tff(decl_49,type,
    r1: $o ).

tff(decl_50,type,
    r2: $o ).

tff(decl_51,type,
    r3: $o ).

tff(decl_52,type,
    r4: $o ).

tff(decl_53,type,
    r5: $o ).

tff(decl_54,type,
    op_or: $o ).

tff(decl_55,type,
    op_and: $o ).

tff(decl_56,type,
    op_implies_and: $o ).

tff(decl_57,type,
    op_implies_or: $o ).

tff(decl_58,type,
    op_equiv: $o ).

tff(decl_59,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_60,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

tff(decl_61,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

tff(decl_62,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

tff(decl_63,type,
    esk5_0: $i ).

tff(decl_64,type,
    esk6_0: $i ).

tff(decl_65,type,
    esk7_0: $i ).

tff(decl_66,type,
    esk8_0: $i ).

tff(decl_67,type,
    esk9_0: $i ).

tff(decl_68,type,
    esk10_0: $i ).

tff(decl_69,type,
    esk11_0: $i ).

tff(decl_70,type,
    esk12_0: $i ).

tff(decl_71,type,
    esk13_0: $i ).

tff(decl_72,type,
    esk14_0: $i ).

tff(decl_73,type,
    esk15_0: $i ).

tff(decl_74,type,
    esk16_0: $i ).

tff(decl_75,type,
    esk17_0: $i ).

tff(decl_76,type,
    esk18_0: $i ).

tff(decl_77,type,
    esk19_0: $i ).

tff(decl_78,type,
    esk20_0: $i ).

tff(decl_79,type,
    esk21_0: $i ).

tff(decl_80,type,
    esk22_0: $i ).

tff(decl_81,type,
    esk23_0: $i ).

tff(decl_82,type,
    esk24_0: $i ).

tff(decl_83,type,
    esk25_0: $i ).

tff(decl_84,type,
    esk26_0: $i ).

tff(decl_85,type,
    esk27_0: $i ).

tff(decl_86,type,
    esk28_0: $i ).

tff(decl_87,type,
    esk29_0: $i ).

tff(decl_88,type,
    esk30_0: $i ).

tff(decl_89,type,
    esk31_0: $i ).

tff(decl_90,type,
    esk32_0: $i ).

tff(decl_91,type,
    esk33_0: $i ).

tff(decl_92,type,
    esk34_0: $i ).

tff(decl_93,type,
    esk35_0: $i ).

tff(decl_94,type,
    esk36_0: $i ).

tff(decl_95,type,
    esk37_0: $i ).

tff(decl_96,type,
    esk38_0: $i ).

tff(decl_97,type,
    esk39_0: $i ).

tff(decl_98,type,
    esk40_0: $i ).

tff(decl_99,type,
    esk41_0: $i ).

tff(decl_100,type,
    esk42_0: $i ).

tff(decl_101,type,
    esk43_0: $i ).

tff(decl_102,type,
    esk44_0: $i ).

tff(decl_103,type,
    esk45_0: $i ).

tff(decl_104,type,
    esk46_0: $i ).

tff(decl_105,type,
    esk47_0: $i ).

tff(decl_106,type,
    esk48_0: $i ).

tff(decl_107,type,
    esk49_0: $i ).

tff(decl_108,type,
    esk50_0: $i ).

tff(decl_109,type,
    esk51_0: $i ).

tff(decl_110,type,
    esk52_0: $i ).

tff(decl_111,type,
    esk53_0: $i ).

tff(decl_112,type,
    esk54_0: $i ).

tff(decl_113,type,
    esk55_0: $i ).

fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).

fof(modus_tollens,axiom,
    ( modus_tollens
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X2),not(X1)),implies(X1,X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_tollens) ).

fof(hilbert_modus_tollens,conjecture,
    modus_tollens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_modus_tollens) ).

fof(op_or,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).

fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

fof(r3,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X4,X5),or(X5,X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r3) ).

fof(op_implies_or,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_or) ).

fof(hilbert_op_or,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_or) ).

fof(principia_r3,axiom,
    r3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_r3) ).

fof(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_op_implies_or) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X121,X122] :
      ( ~ op_implies_and
      | implies(X121,X122) = not(and(X121,not(X122))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( ( ~ modus_tollens
        | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X16),not(X15)),implies(X15,X16))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk6_0),not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0)))
        | modus_tollens ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_tollens])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ modus_tollens,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_modus_tollens])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X117,X118] :
      ( ~ op_or
      | or(X117,X118) = not(and(not(X117),not(X118))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_or])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2)))
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X101,X102] :
      ( ( ~ r3
        | is_a_theorem(implies(or(X101,X102),or(X102,X101))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk48_0,esk49_0),or(esk49_0,esk48_0)))
        | r3 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r3])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X123,X124] :
      ( ~ op_implies_or
      | implies(X123,X124) = or(not(X123),X124) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_or])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( modus_tollens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk6_0),not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ modus_tollens,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2)))
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_or]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ r3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    r3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r3]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk6_0),not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = or(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk6_0,not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : LCL483+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 19:10:43 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.58  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.62  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.62  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.62  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.62  % Total time : 0.031000 s
% 0.20/0.62  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.62  % Total time : 0.034000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------