TSTP Solution File: LCL459+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : LCL459+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:48:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   53 (  19 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   98 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   84 (  36   ~;  29   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   8 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   0 usr;   3 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   3   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (  54   !;   2   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_34,type,
    sQ2_eqProxy: ( $int * $int ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_35,type,
    sQ3_eqProxy: ( $rat * $rat ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_36,type,
    sQ4_eqProxy: ( $real * $real ) > $o ).

fof(f404,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f239,f304]) ).

fof(f304,plain,
    ! [X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,and(X1,X1))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f268,f247]) ).

fof(f247,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f190,f193]) ).

fof(f193,plain,
    and_3,
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f130]) ).

fof(f130,plain,
    and_3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f42,axiom,
    and_3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_and_3) ).

fof(f190,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ and_3
      | is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ),
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f132]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ and_3
      | is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1))))
    | ~ and_3 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f95]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ( ! [X1,X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X0,and(X1,X0))))
    | ~ and_3 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ( and_3
   => ! [X1,X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X0,and(X1,X0)))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ( and_3
  <=> ! [X1,X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X0,and(X1,X0)))) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ( ! [X1,X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1))))
  <=> and_3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_3) ).

fof(f268,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)))
      | is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f267,f248]) ).

fof(f248,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f198,f175]) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f133]) ).

fof(f133,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f35,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_modus_ponens) ).

fof(f198,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ modus_ponens
      | is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f128]) ).

fof(f128,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
        | is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) )
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f106]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ( ! [X1,X0] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0))
        | is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) )
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f105]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0)) )
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ( modus_ponens
   => ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X1)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0)) )
       => is_a_theorem(X0) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X1)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0)) )
       => is_a_theorem(X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X1,X0] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
          & is_a_theorem(X0) )
       => is_a_theorem(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',modus_ponens) ).

fof(f267,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X0)),implies(X1,X0))),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f194,f169]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    implies_2,
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f129]) ).

fof(f129,plain,
    implies_2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f38,axiom,
    implies_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_implies_2) ).

fof(f194,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ implies_2
      | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X0)),implies(X1,X0))) ),
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f161]) ).

fof(f161,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ implies_2
      | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X0)),implies(X1,X0))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ( ~ implies_2
    | ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X0)),implies(X1,X0))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f87]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ( implies_2
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X0)),implies(X1,X0))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f58]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ( implies_2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X0)),implies(X1,X0))) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ( implies_2
  <=> ! [X1,X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',implies_2) ).

fof(f239,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0))),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f174,f183]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    ~ kn1,
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f151]) ).

fof(f151,plain,
    ~ kn1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f73]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    ~ kn1,
    inference(flattening,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ kn1,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    kn1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rosser_kn1) ).

fof(f174,plain,
    ( kn1
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0))) ),
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f127]) ).

fof(f127,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0)))
    | kn1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f115]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    ( kn1
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0))) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f109,f114]) ).

fof(f114,plain,
    ( ? [X0] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,and(X0,X0)))
   => ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0))) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f109,plain,
    ( kn1
    | ? [X0] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,and(X0,X0))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f76]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,and(X0,X0)))
   => kn1 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,and(X0,X0)))
  <=> kn1 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ( ! [X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(X3,and(X3,X3)))
  <=> kn1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kn1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.12  % Problem    : LCL459+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.05/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 01:59:17 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.44  % (28561)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.15/0.46  % (28561)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.46  % (28569)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.15/0.47  % (28569)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.47  % (28561)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.47  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.47  % (28561)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.47  % (28561)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.15/0.47  % (28561)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.15/0.47  % (28561)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.47  
% 0.15/0.47  % (28561)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.15/0.47  % (28561)Time elapsed: 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.47  % (28561)Instructions burned: 15 (million)
% 0.15/0.47  % (28561)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.47  % (28561)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.47  % (28546)Success in time 0.124 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------