TSTP Solution File: LCL457+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : LCL457+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:11:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 16
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 63 ( 31 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 119 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 99 ( 43 ~; 38 |; 9 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 9 usr; 9 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 19 ( 19 usr; 15 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 97 ( 12 sgn 38 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
( op_implies_and
=> ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).
fof(op_or,axiom,
( op_or
=> ! [X1,X2] : or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).
fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
op_implies_and,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).
fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
( modus_ponens
<=> ! [X1,X2] :
( ( is_a_theorem(X1)
& is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) )
=> is_a_theorem(X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).
fof(or_3,axiom,
( or_3
<=> ! [X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X3),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(or(X1,X2),X3)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',or_3) ).
fof(hilbert_op_or,axiom,
op_or,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_op_or) ).
fof(implies_3,axiom,
( implies_3
<=> ! [X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_3) ).
fof(principia_r4,conjecture,
r4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',principia_r4) ).
fof(hilbert_modus_ponens,axiom,
modus_ponens,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_modus_ponens) ).
fof(hilbert_or_3,axiom,
or_3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_or_3) ).
fof(hilbert_implies_3,axiom,
implies_3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_implies_3) ).
fof(implies_1,axiom,
( implies_1
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_1) ).
fof(r4,axiom,
( r4
<=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X4,or(X5,X6)),or(X5,or(X4,X6)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r4) ).
fof(hilbert_implies_1,axiom,
implies_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_implies_1) ).
fof(or_1,axiom,
( or_1
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X1,X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',or_1) ).
fof(hilbert_or_1,axiom,
or_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_or_1) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ op_implies_and
| implies(X3,X4) = not(and(X3,not(X4))) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ op_or
| or(X3,X4) = not(and(not(X3),not(X4))) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_or])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2)))
| ~ op_implies_and ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
op_implies_and,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ modus_ponens
| ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X4))
| is_a_theorem(X4) )
& ( is_a_theorem(esk1_0)
| modus_ponens )
& ( is_a_theorem(implies(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| modus_ponens )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(esk2_0)
| modus_ponens ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ or_3
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X6),implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(or(X4,X5),X6)))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk24_0,esk26_0),implies(implies(esk25_0,esk26_0),implies(or(esk24_0,esk25_0),esk26_0))))
| or_3 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[or_3])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2)))
| ~ op_or ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
op_or,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_or]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ implies_3
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(X4,X6)))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk11_0,esk12_0),implies(implies(esk12_0,esk13_0),implies(esk11_0,esk13_0))))
| implies_3 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_3])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ r4,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[principia_r4]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ modus_ponens ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
modus_ponens,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_modus_ponens]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X3,X2),implies(or(X1,X3),X2))))
| ~ or_3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
or(X1,X2) = implies(not(X1),X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
or_3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_or_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))))
| ~ implies_3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
implies_3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_3]) ).
fof(c_0_34,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ implies_1
| is_a_theorem(implies(X3,implies(X4,X3))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk7_0,implies(esk8_0,esk7_0)))
| implies_1 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_1])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_35,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9] :
( ( ~ r4
| is_a_theorem(implies(or(X7,or(X8,X9)),or(X8,or(X7,X9)))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk50_0,or(esk51_0,esk52_0)),or(esk51_0,or(esk50_0,esk52_0))))
| r4 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r4])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ r4,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X3,X2),implies(implies(not(X1),X3),X2)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)))
| ~ implies_1 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
implies_1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_1]) ).
fof(c_0_42,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ or_1
| is_a_theorem(implies(X3,or(X3,X4))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk20_0,or(esk20_0,esk21_0)))
| or_1 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[or_1])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( r4
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk50_0,or(esk51_0,esk52_0)),or(esk51_0,or(esk50_0,esk52_0)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
~ r4,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(not(X3),X1),X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41])]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X1,X2)))
| ~ or_1 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
or_1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_or_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk50_0),implies(not(esk51_0),esk52_0)),implies(not(esk51_0),implies(not(esk50_0),esk52_0)))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_30]),c_0_30]),c_0_30]),c_0_30]),c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),X3))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(X2,X3))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_30]),c_0_49])]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk51_0),esk52_0),implies(not(esk51_0),implies(not(esk50_0),esk52_0))))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk50_0,implies(not(esk51_0),implies(not(esk50_0),esk52_0)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X1),X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_52]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),X3),implies(X1,X3))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk50_0,implies(not(esk51_0),implies(not(esk50_0),esk52_0))))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk52_0,implies(not(esk51_0),implies(not(esk50_0),esk52_0)))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_51]),c_0_53])]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,X1)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X3),X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_56]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk50_0,implies(not(esk51_0),implies(not(esk50_0),esk52_0)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58])]) ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(not(X1),X3)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : LCL457+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 16:32:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.22/1.41
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 63
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 37
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 26
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 16
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 16
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 11
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 28
% 0.22/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 53
% 0.22/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Initial clauses : 82
% 0.22/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 82
% 0.22/1.41 # Processed clauses : 1575
% 0.22/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 195
% 0.22/1.41 # ...subsumed : 775
% 0.22/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 605
% 0.22/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 18
% 0.22/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 344
% 0.22/1.41 # Generated clauses : 9067
% 0.22/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 6497
% 0.22/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 38
% 0.22/1.41 # Paramodulations : 9059
% 0.22/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 240
% 0.22/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 131
% 0.22/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 30
% 0.22/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 79
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1078
% 0.22/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 1850
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 362
% 0.22/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12425
% 0.22/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12244
% 0.22/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 515
% 0.22/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2038
% 0.22/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 9814
% 0.22/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 282
% 0.22/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 144942
% 0.22/1.41
% 0.22/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.41 # User time : 0.162 s
% 0.22/1.41 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/1.41 # Total time : 0.168 s
% 0.22/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 9396 pages
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------