TSTP Solution File: LCL451+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : LCL451+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:22:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 10 ~; 6 |; 2 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(luka_cn1,conjecture,
cn1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',luka_cn1) ).
fof(cn1,axiom,
( cn1
<=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(X4,X6)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',cn1) ).
fof(implies_3,axiom,
( implies_3
<=> ! [X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_3) ).
fof(hilbert_implies_3,axiom,
implies_3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_implies_3) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ cn1,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[luka_cn1]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X83,X84,X85] :
( ( ~ cn1
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X83,X84),implies(implies(X84,X85),implies(X83,X85)))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk39_0,esk40_0),implies(implies(esk40_0,esk41_0),implies(esk39_0,esk41_0))))
| cn1 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cn1])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ cn1,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X27,X28,X29] :
( ( ~ implies_3
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X27,X28),implies(implies(X28,X29),implies(X27,X29)))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk11_0,esk12_0),implies(implies(esk12_0,esk13_0),implies(esk11_0,esk13_0))))
| implies_3 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_3])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( cn1
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk39_0,esk40_0),implies(implies(esk40_0,esk41_0),implies(esk39_0,esk41_0)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ cn1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))))
| ~ implies_3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
implies_3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk39_0,esk40_0),implies(implies(esk40_0,esk41_0),implies(esk39_0,esk41_0)))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : LCL451+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 05:23:45 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 0.12/0.38 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.38 #
% 0.12/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 # Proof found!
% 0.12/0.38 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.38 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.38 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------