TSTP Solution File: LCL451+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : LCL451+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:11:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 10 ~; 6 |; 2 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(luka_cn1,conjecture,
cn1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',luka_cn1) ).
fof(cn1,axiom,
( cn1
<=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(X4,X6)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',cn1) ).
fof(implies_3,axiom,
( implies_3
<=> ! [X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_3) ).
fof(hilbert_implies_3,axiom,
implies_3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_implies_3) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ cn1,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[luka_cn1]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9] :
( ( ~ cn1
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X7,X8),implies(implies(X8,X9),implies(X7,X9)))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk39_0,esk40_0),implies(implies(esk40_0,esk41_0),implies(esk39_0,esk41_0))))
| cn1 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cn1])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ cn1,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ implies_3
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(X4,X6)))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk11_0,esk12_0),implies(implies(esk12_0,esk13_0),implies(esk11_0,esk13_0))))
| implies_3 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_3])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( cn1
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk39_0,esk40_0),implies(implies(esk40_0,esk41_0),implies(esk39_0,esk41_0)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ cn1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))))
| ~ implies_3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
implies_3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk39_0,esk40_0),implies(implies(esk40_0,esk41_0),implies(esk39_0,esk41_0)))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LCL451+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 05:31:34 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.23/1.42 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 53
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 51
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 551
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2744 pages
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 15
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 53
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 82
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 82
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 76
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 21
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 55
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 67
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 60
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 67
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 46
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 33
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 60
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 109
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 24
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5047
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 3064 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------