TSTP Solution File: LCL451+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : LCL451+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:54:10 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   97
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  107 (   8 unt;  93 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (   9   ~;   6   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (   6   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   34 (  33 usr;  33 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   60 (  60 usr;  55 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn;  12   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    modus_ponens: $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    substitution_of_equivalents: $o ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    equiv: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    modus_tollens: $o ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    implies_1: $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    implies_2: $o ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    implies_3: $o ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    and_1: $o ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    and: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    and_2: $o ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    and_3: $o ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    or_1: $o ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    or: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    or_2: $o ).

tff(decl_39,type,
    or_3: $o ).

tff(decl_40,type,
    equivalence_1: $o ).

tff(decl_41,type,
    equivalence_2: $o ).

tff(decl_42,type,
    equivalence_3: $o ).

tff(decl_43,type,
    kn1: $o ).

tff(decl_44,type,
    kn2: $o ).

tff(decl_45,type,
    kn3: $o ).

tff(decl_46,type,
    cn1: $o ).

tff(decl_47,type,
    cn2: $o ).

tff(decl_48,type,
    cn3: $o ).

tff(decl_49,type,
    r1: $o ).

tff(decl_50,type,
    r2: $o ).

tff(decl_51,type,
    r3: $o ).

tff(decl_52,type,
    r4: $o ).

tff(decl_53,type,
    r5: $o ).

tff(decl_54,type,
    op_or: $o ).

tff(decl_55,type,
    op_and: $o ).

tff(decl_56,type,
    op_implies_and: $o ).

tff(decl_57,type,
    op_implies_or: $o ).

tff(decl_58,type,
    op_equiv: $o ).

tff(decl_59,type,
    op_implies: $o ).

tff(decl_60,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_61,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

tff(decl_62,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

tff(decl_63,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

tff(decl_64,type,
    esk5_0: $i ).

tff(decl_65,type,
    esk6_0: $i ).

tff(decl_66,type,
    esk7_0: $i ).

tff(decl_67,type,
    esk8_0: $i ).

tff(decl_68,type,
    esk9_0: $i ).

tff(decl_69,type,
    esk10_0: $i ).

tff(decl_70,type,
    esk11_0: $i ).

tff(decl_71,type,
    esk12_0: $i ).

tff(decl_72,type,
    esk13_0: $i ).

tff(decl_73,type,
    esk14_0: $i ).

tff(decl_74,type,
    esk15_0: $i ).

tff(decl_75,type,
    esk16_0: $i ).

tff(decl_76,type,
    esk17_0: $i ).

tff(decl_77,type,
    esk18_0: $i ).

tff(decl_78,type,
    esk19_0: $i ).

tff(decl_79,type,
    esk20_0: $i ).

tff(decl_80,type,
    esk21_0: $i ).

tff(decl_81,type,
    esk22_0: $i ).

tff(decl_82,type,
    esk23_0: $i ).

tff(decl_83,type,
    esk24_0: $i ).

tff(decl_84,type,
    esk25_0: $i ).

tff(decl_85,type,
    esk26_0: $i ).

tff(decl_86,type,
    esk27_0: $i ).

tff(decl_87,type,
    esk28_0: $i ).

tff(decl_88,type,
    esk29_0: $i ).

tff(decl_89,type,
    esk30_0: $i ).

tff(decl_90,type,
    esk31_0: $i ).

tff(decl_91,type,
    esk32_0: $i ).

tff(decl_92,type,
    esk33_0: $i ).

tff(decl_93,type,
    esk34_0: $i ).

tff(decl_94,type,
    esk35_0: $i ).

tff(decl_95,type,
    esk36_0: $i ).

tff(decl_96,type,
    esk37_0: $i ).

tff(decl_97,type,
    esk38_0: $i ).

tff(decl_98,type,
    esk39_0: $i ).

tff(decl_99,type,
    esk40_0: $i ).

tff(decl_100,type,
    esk41_0: $i ).

tff(decl_101,type,
    esk42_0: $i ).

tff(decl_102,type,
    esk43_0: $i ).

tff(decl_103,type,
    esk44_0: $i ).

tff(decl_104,type,
    esk45_0: $i ).

tff(decl_105,type,
    esk46_0: $i ).

tff(decl_106,type,
    esk47_0: $i ).

tff(decl_107,type,
    esk48_0: $i ).

tff(decl_108,type,
    esk49_0: $i ).

tff(decl_109,type,
    esk50_0: $i ).

tff(decl_110,type,
    esk51_0: $i ).

tff(decl_111,type,
    esk52_0: $i ).

tff(decl_112,type,
    esk53_0: $i ).

tff(decl_113,type,
    esk54_0: $i ).

tff(decl_114,type,
    esk55_0: $i ).

fof(cn1,axiom,
    ( cn1
  <=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(X4,X6)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',cn1) ).

fof(luka_cn1,conjecture,
    cn1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',luka_cn1) ).

fof(implies_3,axiom,
    ( implies_3
  <=> ! [X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_3) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_3,axiom,
    implies_3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_implies_3) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X83,X84,X85] :
      ( ( ~ cn1
        | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X83,X84),implies(implies(X84,X85),implies(X83,X85)))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk39_0,esk40_0),implies(implies(esk40_0,esk41_0),implies(esk39_0,esk41_0))))
        | cn1 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cn1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn1,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[luka_cn1])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X27,X28,X29] :
      ( ( ~ implies_3
        | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X27,X28),implies(implies(X28,X29),implies(X27,X29)))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk11_0,esk12_0),implies(implies(esk12_0,esk13_0),implies(esk11_0,esk13_0))))
        | implies_3 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_3])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( cn1
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk39_0,esk40_0),implies(implies(esk40_0,esk41_0),implies(esk39_0,esk41_0)))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))))
    | ~ implies_3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    implies_3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk39_0,esk40_0),implies(implies(esk40_0,esk41_0),implies(esk39_0,esk41_0)))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : LCL451+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 21:11:48 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.58  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.60  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.60  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.60  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.60  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.61  % Total time : 0.010000 s
% 0.20/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.61  % Total time : 0.014000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------