TSTP Solution File: LCL445-2 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : LCL445-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 00:15:10 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.72s 0.92s
% Output : Refutation 0.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 8 ( 5 ~; 3 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f19,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f11,f15]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f7,f6,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,X3),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,X3),X0,X3),X0,X3),X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms__excluded__middle_0) ).
fof(f7,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f1,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Odeduction_0) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(v_p,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f11,plain,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f8,f3,f5]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
~ c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f8,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f2,f4]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL445-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 00:38:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN problem
% 0.13/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.72/0.92 % (14614)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14612)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14615)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14613)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14616)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14617)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14618)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14619)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14619)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (14619)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.92 % (14619)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14619)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 % (14619)Memory used [KB]: 949
% 0.72/0.92 % (14619)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.72/0.92 % (14619)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14617)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (14617)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.92 % (14617)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14617)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 % (14617)Memory used [KB]: 963
% 0.72/0.92 % (14617)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.72/0.92 % (14617)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14616)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (14616)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.92 % (14616)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14616)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 % (14616)Memory used [KB]: 964
% 0.72/0.92 % (14616)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.72/0.92 % (14616)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14619)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.92 % (14619)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.92 % (14617)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.92 % (14617)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.92 % (14615)First to succeed.
% 0.72/0.92 % (14616)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.92 % (14616)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.92 % (14612)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.92 % (14615)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-14611"
% 0.72/0.92 % (14613)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.92 % (14618)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.92 % (14615)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.72/0.92 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.72/0.92 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.72/0.92 % (14615)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.92 % (14615)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14615)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.72/0.92
% 0.72/0.92 % (14615)Memory used [KB]: 977
% 0.72/0.92 % (14615)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.72/0.92 % (14615)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.72/0.92 % (14611)Success in time 0.561 s
% 0.72/0.92 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------