TSTP Solution File: LCL443-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL443-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:30:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11 % Problem : LCL443-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.02/0.11 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 20:25:41 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.11/0.34 The process was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.11/0.34 Mon Jul 4 20:25:41 2022
% 0.11/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 7967.
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.11/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.11/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 list(usable).
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.11/0.34 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.11/0.34 in usable.
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.17/0.38
% 0.17/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.17/0.38
% 0.17/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.17/0.38
% 0.17/0.38
% 0.17/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.17/0.38
% 0.17/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.17/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.17/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.17/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 5
% 0.17/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 8
% 0.17/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 62
% 0.17/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.17/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.17/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.17/0.38 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.17/0.38 distinct function count: 4
% 0.17/0.38 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.17/0.38
% 0.17/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.17/0.38
% 0.17/0.38
% 0.17/0.38
% 0.17/0.38 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.17/0.38
% 0.17/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.17/0.38
% 0.17/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.17/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.39 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.02 sec ----> 94 [binary,93.1,5.1] {-} $F.
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 Length of proof is 6. Level of proof is 4.
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.17/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.39 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 1 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_PropLog_Othms(B,C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C))| -c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,D,C),c_PropLog_Othms(B,C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C))|c_in(D,c_PropLog_Othms(B,C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C)).
% 0.17/0.39 2 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(B,C,tc_PropLog_Opl(D)),D),tc_PropLog_Opl(D))|c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(B,A,D),c_PropLog_Othms(C,D),tc_PropLog_Opl(D)).
% 0.17/0.39 3 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,tc_PropLog_Opl(C))|c_in(A,c_PropLog_Othms(B,C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C)).
% 0.17/0.39 4 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_PropLog_Othms(B,C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C))|c_in(A,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(D,B,tc_PropLog_Opl(C)),C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C)).
% 0.17/0.39 5 [] {+} -c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)).
% 0.17/0.39 6 [] {+} c_in(A,c_insert(A,B,C),C).
% 0.17/0.39 7 [] {-} c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)).
% 0.17/0.39 8 [] {-} c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_q,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)).
% 0.17/0.39 9 [hyper,6,3] {+} c_in(A,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(A,B,tc_PropLog_Opl(C)),C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C)).
% 0.17/0.39 10 [hyper,7,4] {-} c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(A,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)).
% 0.17/0.39 14 [hyper,8,4] {-} c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_q,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(A,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)).
% 0.17/0.39 22 [hyper,9,1,10] {-} c_in(A,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,A,t_a),v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)).
% 0.17/0.39 60 [hyper,22,1,14] {-} c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)).
% 0.17/0.39 93 [hyper,60,2] {-} c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)).
% 0.17/0.39 94 [binary,93.1,5.1] {-} $F.
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.17/0.39 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 ============ end of search ============
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 true clauses given 5 (16.7%)
% 0.17/0.39 false clauses given 25
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 FALSE TRUE
% 0.17/0.39 14 0 1
% 0.17/0.39 15 8 1
% 0.17/0.39 16 8 1
% 0.17/0.39 17 12 3
% 0.17/0.39 18 7 2
% 0.17/0.39 19 2 2
% 0.17/0.39 20 3 1
% 0.17/0.39 21 0 1
% 0.17/0.39 22 0 1
% 0.17/0.39 23 1 0
% 0.17/0.39 24 0 1
% 0.17/0.39 tot: 41 14 (25.5% true)
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 Process 7967 finished Mon Jul 4 20:25:41 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------