TSTP Solution File: LCL371-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL371-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:29:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 16.26s 16.49s
% Output : Refutation 16.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.11 % Problem : LCL371-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 03:22:15 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.11/0.34 The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.11/0.34 Sun Jul 3 03:22:15 2022
% 0.11/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 3732.
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.11/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.11/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 list(usable).
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.11/0.34 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.11/0.34 in usable.
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.11/0.36 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.11/0.36 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.11/0.36 number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.11/0.36 number of clauses initially in problem: 5
% 0.11/0.36 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 40
% 0.11/0.36 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 80
% 0.11/0.36 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.11/0.36 absolute distinct symbol count: 5
% 0.11/0.36 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.11/0.36 distinct function count: 2
% 0.11/0.36 distinct constant count: 2
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 =========== start of search ===========
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Changing weight limit from 60 to 46.
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Model 5 [ 1 1 92 ] (0.00 seconds, 214428 Inserts)
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Model 6 [ 1 0 194 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Model 7 [ 1 0 228 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Model 8 [ 2 1 1004 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.47/7.64
% 7.47/7.64 Resetting weight limit to 46 after 165 givens.
% 7.47/7.64
% 8.73/8.93
% 8.73/8.93
% 8.73/8.93 Changing weight limit from 46 to 33.
% 8.73/8.93
% 8.73/8.93 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 235 givens.
% 8.73/8.93
% 8.78/8.97
% 8.78/8.97
% 8.78/8.97 Changing weight limit from 33 to 32.
% 8.78/8.97
% 8.78/8.97 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 240 givens.
% 8.78/8.97
% 8.78/9.03
% 8.78/9.03
% 8.78/9.03 Changing weight limit from 32 to 28.
% 8.78/9.03
% 8.78/9.03 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 245 givens.
% 8.78/9.03
% 8.88/9.09
% 8.88/9.09
% 8.88/9.09 Changing weight limit from 28 to 25.
% 8.88/9.09
% 8.88/9.09 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 250 givens.
% 8.88/9.09
% 8.93/9.14
% 8.93/9.14
% 8.93/9.14 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 8.93/9.14
% 8.93/9.14 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 255 givens.
% 8.93/9.14
% 8.98/9.18
% 8.98/9.18
% 8.98/9.18 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 8.98/9.18
% 8.98/9.18 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 260 givens.
% 8.98/9.18
% 9.08/9.28
% 9.08/9.28
% 9.08/9.28 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 9.08/9.28
% 9.08/9.28 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 270 givens.
% 9.08/9.28
% 13.76/13.93
% 13.76/13.93
% 13.76/13.93 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 13.76/13.93
% 13.76/13.93 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.76/13.93
% 13.76/13.93 Model 9 [ 2 1 327 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 13.76/13.93
% 13.76/13.93 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.76/13.93
% 13.76/13.93 Model 10 [ 5 1 392 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 13.76/13.93
% 13.76/13.93 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 405 givens.
% 13.76/13.93
% 13.77/13.95
% 13.77/13.95
% 13.77/13.95 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 13.77/13.95
% 13.77/13.95 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 410 givens.
% 13.77/13.95
% 13.77/14.01
% 13.77/14.01
% 13.77/14.01 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 13.77/14.01
% 13.77/14.01 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 13.77/14.01
% 13.77/14.01
% 13.77/14.01 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 425 givens.
% 13.77/14.01
% 13.86/14.07
% 13.86/14.07
% 13.86/14.07 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 13.86/14.07
% 13.86/14.07 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 440 givens.
% 13.86/14.07
% 14.07/14.24
% 14.07/14.24
% 14.07/14.24 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 14.07/14.24
% 14.07/14.24 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 480 givens.
% 14.07/14.24
% 14.38/14.57
% 14.38/14.57
% 14.38/14.57 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 14.38/14.57
% 14.38/14.57 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 565 givens.
% 14.38/14.57
% 15.17/15.38
% 15.17/15.38
% 15.17/15.38 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 15.17/15.38
% 15.17/15.38 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 840 givens.
% 15.17/15.38
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 15.90 sec ----> 42384 [binary,42383.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 Length of proof is 34. Level of proof is 22.
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 16.26/16.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 16.26/16.49 % SZS output start Refutation
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 1 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 16.26/16.49 2 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(x,y),y),implies(implies(y,x),x))).
% 16.26/16.49 3 [] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))).
% 16.26/16.49 4 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),A),A)).
% 16.26/16.49 5 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(A),B))).
% 16.26/16.49 6 [hyper,3,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D),implies(implies(C,A),D))).
% 16.26/16.49 7 [hyper,4,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(not(A),A),B))).
% 16.26/16.49 9 [hyper,5,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(A),B),C),implies(A,C))).
% 16.26/16.49 12 [hyper,7,1,7] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(A,B)),implies(A,B)),implies(implies(not(A),A),B))).
% 16.26/16.49 21 [hyper,6,1,7] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D)),implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D)),implies(implies(C,A),D))).
% 16.26/16.49 28 [hyper,9,1,7] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(implies(not(A),B),C)),implies(implies(not(A),B),C)),implies(A,C))).
% 16.26/16.49 29 [hyper,9,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,not(B)),implies(B,implies(A,C)))).
% 16.26/16.49 34 [hyper,9,1,4] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)).
% 16.26/16.49 40 [hyper,29,1,9] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(not(A),C)))).
% 16.26/16.49 43 [hyper,29,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),D),implies(implies(B,not(A)),D))).
% 16.26/16.49 60 [hyper,40,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(not(B),C)),D),implies(B,D))).
% 16.26/16.49 78 [hyper,60,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(not(A),B),C),implies(D,C)))).
% 16.26/16.49 91 [hyper,78,1,34] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B),C),implies(D,C))).
% 16.26/16.49 119 [hyper,91,1,4] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,B))).
% 16.26/16.49 183 [hyper,119,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,A),B),implies(C,B))).
% 16.26/16.49 184 [hyper,12,1,91] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(not(B),B),B))).
% 16.26/16.49 208 [hyper,183,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(implies(implies(D,D),B),C))).
% 16.26/16.49 280 [hyper,184,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(not(A),A),A),B),implies(C,B))).
% 16.26/16.49 319 [hyper,280,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(not(B),B)),implies(C,implies(A,B)))).
% 16.26/16.49 2260 [hyper,319,1,43] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(C,implies(B,A)))).
% 16.26/16.49 2319 [hyper,2260,1,319] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(not(B),not(C)),implies(C,B)))).
% 16.26/16.49 2337 [hyper,2319,1,2319] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A))).
% 16.26/16.49 2353 [hyper,2319,1,28] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))).
% 16.26/16.49 2376 [hyper,2353,1,3] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(B,C))).
% 16.26/16.49 2429 [hyper,2337,1,208] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,A),not(B)),implies(B,C))).
% 16.26/16.49 3422 [hyper,2376,1,2429] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),implies(A,B))).
% 16.26/16.49 4210 [hyper,3422,1,3] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(not(A),C))).
% 16.26/16.49 23668 [hyper,4210,1,319] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(B,C),B),B))).
% 16.26/16.49 23776 [hyper,23668,1,21] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(A,B)),implies(A,B))).
% 16.26/16.49 24115 [hyper,23776,1,319] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(not(B),B)),implies(A,B))).
% 16.26/16.49 24563 [hyper,24115,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),B),implies(implies(B,A),A))).
% 16.26/16.49 25056 [hyper,24563,1,23668] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),A),C),C)).
% 16.26/16.49 35506 [hyper,25056,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(implies(B,C),B)),implies(A,B))).
% 16.26/16.49 42383 [hyper,35506,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(implies(C,A),A))).
% 16.26/16.49 42384 [binary,42383.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 % SZS output end Refutation
% 16.26/16.49 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 ============ end of search ============
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 true clauses given 378 (30.0%)
% 16.26/16.49 false clauses given 884
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 FALSE TRUE
% 16.26/16.49 12 134 190
% 16.26/16.49 13 976 646
% 16.26/16.49 14 1393 1072
% 16.26/16.49 15 4 591
% 16.26/16.49 tot: 2507 2499 (49.9% true)
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 Model 10 [ 5 1 392 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 Process 3732 finished Sun Jul 3 03:22:31 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------