TSTP Solution File: LCL370-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL370-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:29:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 23.91s 24.17s
% Output : Refutation 23.91s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LCL370-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 12:43:45 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Sun Jul 3 12:43:45 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 9584.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.13/0.36 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.36 in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.13/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 5
% 0.13/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 40
% 0.13/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 83
% 0.13/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 0.13/0.38 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.13/0.38 distinct function count: 2
% 0.13/0.38 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Changing weight limit from 60 to 59.
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Model 5 [ 1 1 72 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Model 6 [ 1 0 4005 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Model 7 [ 1 1 368 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Model 8 [ 1 0 495 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Model 9 [ 1 1 405 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Model 10 [ 1 4 28091 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Model 11 [ 2 1 872 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Model 12 [ 8 3 18463 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Model 13 [ 3 1 445 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.68/18.87 Resetting weight limit to 59 after 205 givens.
% 18.68/18.87
% 18.75/18.93
% 18.75/18.93
% 18.75/18.93 Changing weight limit from 59 to 31.
% 18.75/18.93
% 18.75/18.93 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 210 givens.
% 18.75/18.93
% 18.76/18.97
% 18.76/18.97
% 18.76/18.97 Changing weight limit from 31 to 28.
% 18.76/18.97
% 18.76/18.97 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 215 givens.
% 18.76/18.97
% 18.96/19.17
% 18.96/19.17
% 18.96/19.17 Changing weight limit from 28 to 24.
% 18.96/19.17
% 18.96/19.17 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 220 givens.
% 18.96/19.17
% 19.06/19.28
% 19.06/19.28
% 19.06/19.28 Changing weight limit from 24 to 22.
% 19.06/19.28
% 19.06/19.28 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 230 givens.
% 19.06/19.28
% 19.20/19.41
% 19.20/19.41
% 19.20/19.41 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 19.20/19.41
% 19.20/19.41 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 240 givens.
% 19.20/19.41
% 19.32/19.52
% 19.32/19.52
% 19.32/19.52 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 19.32/19.52
% 19.32/19.52 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 245 givens.
% 19.32/19.52
% 19.36/19.58
% 19.36/19.58
% 19.36/19.58 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 19.36/19.58
% 19.36/19.58 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 250 givens.
% 19.36/19.58
% 23.15/23.37
% 23.15/23.37
% 23.15/23.37 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 23.15/23.37
% 23.15/23.37 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 23.15/23.37
% 23.15/23.37 Model 14 [ 3 1 1486 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 23.15/23.37
% 23.15/23.37 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 23.15/23.37
% 23.15/23.37 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 285 givens.
% 23.15/23.37
% 23.23/23.47
% 23.23/23.47
% 23.23/23.47 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 23.23/23.47
% 23.23/23.47 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 305 givens.
% 23.23/23.47
% 23.43/23.68
% 23.43/23.68
% 23.43/23.68 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 23.43/23.68
% 23.43/23.68 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 390 givens.
% 23.43/23.68
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 23.73 sec ----> 17186 [binary,17185.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17 Length of proof is 31. Level of proof is 21.
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 23.91/24.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 23.91/24.17 % SZS output start Refutation
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17 1 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 23.91/24.17 2 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(x,y),z),implies(implies(z,x),x))).
% 23.91/24.17 3 [] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))).
% 23.91/24.17 4 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),A),A)).
% 23.91/24.17 5 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(A),B))).
% 23.91/24.17 6 [hyper,3,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D),implies(implies(C,A),D))).
% 23.91/24.17 7 [hyper,4,1,3] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(not(A),A),B))).
% 23.91/24.17 9 [hyper,5,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(A),B),C),implies(A,C))).
% 23.91/24.17 15 [hyper,9,1,4] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)).
% 23.91/24.17 18 [hyper,6,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(D,B),implies(A,implies(D,C))))).
% 23.91/24.17 21 [hyper,6,1,9] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,not(B)),implies(B,implies(A,C)))).
% 23.91/24.17 24 [hyper,21,1,9] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(not(A),C)))).
% 23.91/24.17 26 [hyper,21,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),D),implies(implies(B,not(A)),D))).
% 23.91/24.17 43 [hyper,7,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D)),implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D)),implies(implies(C,A),D))).
% 23.91/24.17 55 [hyper,24,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(not(B),C)),D),implies(B,D))).
% 23.91/24.17 71 [hyper,55,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(not(A),B),C),implies(D,C)))).
% 23.91/24.17 85 [hyper,71,1,15] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B),C),implies(D,C))).
% 23.91/24.17 111 [hyper,85,1,4] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,B))).
% 23.91/24.17 162 [hyper,111,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,A),B),implies(C,B))).
% 23.91/24.17 203 [hyper,162,1,7] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(not(B),B),B))).
% 23.91/24.17 437 [hyper,203,1,18] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(not(B),B)),implies(C,implies(A,B)))).
% 23.91/24.17 941 [hyper,437,1,437] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,implies(not(C),C)),implies(B,C)))).
% 23.91/24.17 947 [hyper,437,1,55] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,A)))).
% 23.91/24.17 949 [hyper,437,1,26] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(C,implies(B,A)))).
% 23.91/24.17 972 [hyper,947,1,437] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,B)))).
% 23.91/24.17 1047 [hyper,972,1,972] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))).
% 23.91/24.17 1070 [hyper,1047,1,3] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(B,C))).
% 23.91/24.17 2244 [hyper,949,1,1070] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),implies(B,implies(A,C)))).
% 23.91/24.17 2274 [hyper,2244,1,437] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(B),implies(B,C)))).
% 23.91/24.17 2289 [hyper,2274,1,2274] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),implies(A,B))).
% 23.91/24.17 4822 [hyper,941,1,43] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),B),implies(implies(B,A),A))).
% 23.91/24.17 4980 [hyper,4822,1,1070] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),B))).
% 23.91/24.17 5019 [hyper,4822,1,2289] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),A)).
% 23.91/24.17 5207 [hyper,4980,1,5019] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),A),C),C)).
% 23.91/24.17 13324 [hyper,5207,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(implies(B,C),B)),implies(A,B))).
% 23.91/24.17 17185 [hyper,13324,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(implies(C,A),A))).
% 23.91/24.17 17186 [binary,17185.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17 % SZS output end Refutation
% 23.91/24.17 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17 ============ end of search ============
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17 true clauses given 181 (30.0%)
% 23.91/24.17 false clauses given 423
% 23.91/24.17
% 23.91/24.17 FALSE TRUE
% 23.91/24.18 10 0 5
% 23.91/24.18 11 0 121
% 23.91/24.18 12 61 379
% 23.91/24.18 13 479 390
% 23.91/24.18 14 853 820
% 23.91/24.18 15 1098 784
% 23.91/24.18 16 35 6
% 23.91/24.18 tot: 2526 2505 (49.8% true)
% 23.91/24.18
% 23.91/24.18
% 23.91/24.18 Model 14 [ 3 -224 1486 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 23.91/24.18
% 23.91/24.18 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 23.91/24.18
% 23.91/24.18 Process 9584 finished Sun Jul 3 12:44:08 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------