TSTP Solution File: LCL320-3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL320-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:47:55 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 20.63s 11.74s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 20.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  18 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  28   ~;  25   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   5   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   71 (;  71   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ theorem > axiom > or > implies > #nlpp > not > q > p

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(theorem,type,
    theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(or,type,
    or: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(not,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(q,type,
    q: $i ).

tff(axiom,type,
    axiom: $i > $o ).

tff(p,type,
    p: $i ).

tff(implies,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_56,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ( implies(X,Y) = or(not(X),Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_50,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_48,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : axiom(implies(A,or(B,A))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_61,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( theorem(X)
      | ~ axiom(X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_54,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : axiom(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_69,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( theorem(X)
      | ~ theorem(implies(Y,X))
      | ~ theorem(Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_77,axiom,
    ~ theorem(or(implies(p,q),implies(not(p),q))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [X_12,Y_13] : ( or(not(X_12),Y_13) = implies(X_12,Y_13) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    ! [A_27,B_28] : axiom(implies(or(A_27,B_28),or(B_28,A_27))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_50]) ).

tff(c_50,plain,
    ! [Y_13,X_12] : axiom(implies(or(Y_13,not(X_12)),implies(X_12,Y_13))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_12,c_44]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [A_2,B_3] : axiom(implies(A_2,or(B_3,A_2))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_48]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [X_14] :
      ( ~ axiom(X_14)
      | theorem(X_14) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_61]) ).

tff(c_139,plain,
    ! [A_40,B_41,C_42] : axiom(implies(implies(A_40,B_41),implies(or(C_42,A_40),or(C_42,B_41)))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_54]) ).

tff(c_148,plain,
    ! [A_40,Y_13,X_12] : axiom(implies(implies(A_40,Y_13),implies(or(not(X_12),A_40),implies(X_12,Y_13)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_12,c_139]) ).

tff(c_416,plain,
    ! [A_83,Y_84,X_85] : axiom(implies(implies(A_83,Y_84),implies(implies(X_85,A_83),implies(X_85,Y_84)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_12,c_148]) ).

tff(c_39,plain,
    ! [Y_25,X_26] :
      ( ~ theorem(Y_25)
      | ~ theorem(implies(Y_25,X_26))
      | theorem(X_26) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_43,plain,
    ! [Y_25,X_26] :
      ( ~ theorem(Y_25)
      | theorem(X_26)
      | ~ axiom(implies(Y_25,X_26)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_39]) ).

tff(c_468,plain,
    ! [A_89,Y_90,X_91] :
      ( ~ theorem(implies(A_89,Y_90))
      | theorem(implies(implies(X_91,A_89),implies(X_91,Y_90))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_416,c_43]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [Y_16,X_15] :
      ( ~ theorem(Y_16)
      | ~ theorem(implies(Y_16,X_15))
      | theorem(X_15) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_1714,plain,
    ! [X_212,A_213,Y_214] :
      ( ~ theorem(implies(X_212,A_213))
      | theorem(implies(X_212,Y_214))
      | ~ theorem(implies(A_213,Y_214)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_468,c_16]) ).

tff(c_3560,plain,
    ! [X_319,Y_320,A_321] :
      ( theorem(implies(X_319,Y_320))
      | ~ theorem(implies(A_321,Y_320))
      | ~ axiom(implies(X_319,A_321)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_1714]) ).

tff(c_15538,plain,
    ! [X_804,Y_805,A_806] :
      ( theorem(implies(X_804,Y_805))
      | ~ axiom(implies(X_804,A_806))
      | ~ axiom(implies(A_806,Y_805)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_3560]) ).

tff(c_15995,plain,
    ! [A_819,Y_820,B_821] :
      ( theorem(implies(A_819,Y_820))
      | ~ axiom(implies(or(B_821,A_819),Y_820)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_15538]) ).

tff(c_16023,plain,
    ! [X_12,Y_13] : theorem(implies(not(X_12),implies(X_12,Y_13))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_15995]) ).

tff(c_16150,plain,
    ! [X_824,Y_825] : theorem(implies(not(X_824),implies(X_824,Y_825))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_15995]) ).

tff(c_260,plain,
    ! [X_58,Y_59] : axiom(implies(implies(X_58,Y_59),or(Y_59,not(X_58)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_12,c_44]) ).

tff(c_268,plain,
    ! [X_58,Y_59] :
      ( ~ theorem(implies(X_58,Y_59))
      | theorem(or(Y_59,not(X_58))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_260,c_43]) ).

tff(c_633,plain,
    ! [A_117,B_118,C_119] :
      ( ~ theorem(implies(A_117,B_118))
      | theorem(implies(or(C_119,A_117),or(C_119,B_118))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_43]) ).

tff(c_1895,plain,
    ! [C_229,A_230,B_231] :
      ( ~ theorem(or(C_229,A_230))
      | theorem(or(C_229,B_231))
      | ~ theorem(implies(A_230,B_231)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_633,c_16]) ).

tff(c_1960,plain,
    ! [Y_59,B_231,X_58] :
      ( theorem(or(Y_59,B_231))
      | ~ theorem(implies(not(X_58),B_231))
      | ~ theorem(implies(X_58,Y_59)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_268,c_1895]) ).

tff(c_53430,plain,
    ! [Y_1778,X_1779,Y_1780] :
      ( theorem(or(Y_1778,implies(X_1779,Y_1780)))
      | ~ theorem(implies(X_1779,Y_1778)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16150,c_1960]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(implies(p,q),implies(not(p),q))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_77]) ).

tff(c_53510,plain,
    ~ theorem(implies(not(p),implies(p,q))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_53430,c_18]) ).

tff(c_53543,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_16023,c_53510]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LCL320-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:19:41 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 20.63/11.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 20.63/11.75  
% 20.63/11.75  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 20.63/11.78  
% 20.63/11.78  Inference rules
% 20.63/11.78  ----------------------
% 20.63/11.78  #Ref     : 0
% 20.63/11.78  #Sup     : 13068
% 20.63/11.78  #Fact    : 0
% 20.63/11.78  #Define  : 0
% 20.63/11.78  #Split   : 4
% 20.63/11.78  #Chain   : 0
% 20.63/11.78  #Close   : 0
% 20.63/11.78  
% 20.63/11.78  Ordering : KBO
% 20.63/11.78  
% 20.63/11.78  Simplification rules
% 20.63/11.78  ----------------------
% 20.63/11.78  #Subsume      : 4000
% 20.63/11.78  #Demod        : 2726
% 20.63/11.78  #Tautology    : 2224
% 20.63/11.78  #SimpNegUnit  : 321
% 20.63/11.78  #BackRed      : 118
% 20.63/11.78  
% 20.63/11.78  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 20.63/11.78  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 20.63/11.78  
% 20.63/11.78  Timing (in seconds)
% 20.63/11.78  ----------------------
% 20.84/11.78  Preprocessing        : 0.42
% 20.84/11.78  Parsing              : 0.22
% 20.84/11.78  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 20.84/11.78  Main loop            : 10.31
% 20.84/11.78  Inferencing          : 1.55
% 20.84/11.78  Reduction            : 3.36
% 20.84/11.78  Demodulation         : 2.43
% 20.84/11.78  BG Simplification    : 0.07
% 20.84/11.78  Subsumption          : 4.69
% 20.84/11.78  Abstraction          : 0.09
% 20.84/11.78  MUC search           : 0.00
% 20.84/11.78  Cooper               : 0.00
% 20.84/11.78  Total                : 10.78
% 20.84/11.78  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 20.84/11.78  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 20.84/11.78  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 20.84/11.78  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------