TSTP Solution File: LCL289-3 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : LCL289-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:27:07 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.36s 1.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   56 (  31 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   90 (   7 equ;  43 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   95 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_2,axiom,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ theorem(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4hU0PYE8bS/E---3.1_20938.p',rule_2) ).

cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4hU0PYE8bS/E---3.1_20938.p',implies_definition) ).

cnf(rule_1,axiom,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ axiom(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4hU0PYE8bS/E---3.1_20938.p',rule_1) ).

cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4hU0PYE8bS/E---3.1_20938.p',axiom_1_5) ).

cnf(axiom_1_2,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4hU0PYE8bS/E---3.1_20938.p',axiom_1_2) ).

cnf(axiom_1_4,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4hU0PYE8bS/E---3.1_20938.p',axiom_1_4) ).

cnf(axiom_1_6,axiom,
    axiom(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4hU0PYE8bS/E---3.1_20938.p',axiom_1_6) ).

cnf(axiom_1_3,axiom,
    axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4hU0PYE8bS/E---3.1_20938.p',axiom_1_3) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(equivalent(not(and(p,not(q))),or(not(p),q))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4hU0PYE8bS/E---3.1_20938.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(equivalent_defn,axiom,
    equivalent(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4hU0PYE8bS/E---3.1_20938.p',equivalent_defn) ).

cnf(and_defn,axiom,
    and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4hU0PYE8bS/E---3.1_20938.p',and_defn) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ theorem(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ theorem(X2) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    implies_definition ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ axiom(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ theorem(X2)
    | ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X1)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ axiom(X1) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    axiom_1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ theorem(X2)
    | ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
    axiom_1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3)))
    | ~ theorem(or(X2,or(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,X1)),X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3)))
    | ~ axiom(or(X2,or(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    axiom_1_4 ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    axiom(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
    axiom_1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ theorem(or(X1,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
    axiom_1_3 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( theorem(or(X1,X2))
    | ~ theorem(X3)
    | ~ axiom(or(X1,or(not(X3),X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),or(not(or(X3,X1)),or(X3,X2)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_13]),c_0_13]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( theorem(or(X1,X2))
    | ~ axiom(or(X1,or(or(X1,X2),X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(equivalent(not(and(p,not(q))),or(not(p),q))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
    equivalent(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)),
    equivalent_defn ).

cnf(c_0_35,axiom,
    and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    and_defn ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( theorem(or(not(or(X1,not(X2))),X1))
    | ~ theorem(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X1,X3)))
    | ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( theorem(or(X1,X2))
    | ~ theorem(or(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X1),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(equivalent(not(and(p,not(q))),or(not(p),q))),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    equivalent(X1,X2) = not(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),not(or(not(X2),X1)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_13]),c_0_13]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ theorem(or(X1,not(X2)))
    | ~ theorem(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( theorem(or(X1,X2))
    | ~ theorem(or(not(X3),X2))
    | ~ theorem(or(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,not(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(not(or(not(or(not(not(not(or(not(p),not(not(q)))))),or(not(p),q))),not(or(not(or(not(p),q)),not(not(or(not(p),not(not(q)))))))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_35]),c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( theorem(not(or(not(X1),not(X2))))
    | ~ theorem(X1)
    | ~ theorem(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( theorem(or(X1,not(not(X2))))
    | ~ theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(not(not(or(not(p),not(not(q)))))),or(not(p),q)))
    | ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),q)),not(not(or(not(p),not(not(q))))))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( theorem(or(not(not(X1)),X2))
    | ~ theorem(or(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),q)),not(not(or(not(p),not(not(q)))))))
    | ~ theorem(or(or(not(p),q),not(or(not(p),not(not(q)))))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ theorem(or(or(not(p),q),not(or(not(p),not(not(q))))))
    | ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),q)),or(not(p),not(not(q))))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(or(not(p),q),not(or(not(p),not(not(q)))))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_37]),c_0_44])]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( theorem(or(or(X1,X2),not(or(X1,X3))))
    | ~ theorem(or(not(X3),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(not(not(not(q))),q)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_49]),c_0_44])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : LCL289-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 08:42:20 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.51  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4hU0PYE8bS/E---3.1_20938.p
% 0.36/1.02  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.36/1.02  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/1.02  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/1.02  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/1.02  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/1.02  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/1.02  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/1.02  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 21031 completed with status 0
% 0.36/1.02  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.36/1.02  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/1.02  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/1.02  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/1.02  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.36/1.02  # Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.36/1.02  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.36/1.02  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 355s (1) cores
% 0.36/1.02  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.36/1.02  # Starting new_bool_3 with 296s (1) cores
% 0.36/1.02  # Starting new_bool_1 with 291s (1) cores
% 0.36/1.02  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.36/1.02  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 21036 completed with status 0
% 0.36/1.02  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.36/1.02  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/1.02  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/1.02  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/1.02  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.36/1.02  # Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.36/1.02  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.36/1.02  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 355s (1) cores
% 0.36/1.02  # Preprocessing time       : 0.043 s
% 0.36/1.02  
% 0.36/1.02  # Proof found!
% 0.36/1.02  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.36/1.02  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/1.02  # Parsed axioms                        : 11
% 0.36/1.02  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.36/1.02  # Initial clauses                      : 11
% 0.36/1.02  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.36/1.02  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 0.36/1.02  # Processed clauses                    : 2488
% 0.36/1.02  # ...of these trivial                  : 10
% 0.36/1.02  # ...subsumed                          : 1409
% 0.36/1.02  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1069
% 0.36/1.02  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.36/1.02  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.36/1.02  # Backward-subsumed                    : 333
% 0.36/1.02  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.36/1.02  # Generated clauses                    : 24503
% 0.36/1.02  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 24217
% 0.36/1.02  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.36/1.02  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 6
% 0.36/1.02  # Paramodulations                      : 24503
% 0.36/1.02  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.36/1.02  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.36/1.02  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.36/1.02  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.36/1.02  # Total rewrite steps                  : 263
% 0.36/1.02  # ...of those cached                   : 213
% 0.36/1.02  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.36/1.02  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.36/1.02  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.36/1.02  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.36/1.02  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.36/1.02  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.36/1.02  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.36/1.02  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.36/1.02  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.36/1.02  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.36/1.02  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.36/1.02  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.36/1.02  # Current number of processed clauses  : 736
% 0.36/1.02  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 26
% 0.36/1.02  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.36/1.02  #    Negative unit clauses             : 51
% 0.36/1.02  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 659
% 0.36/1.02  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 21423
% 0.36/1.02  # ...number of literals in the above   : 71292
% 0.36/1.02  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.36/1.02  # Current number of archived clauses   : 336
% 0.36/1.02  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 94206
% 0.36/1.02  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 83026
% 0.36/1.02  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1104
% 0.36/1.02  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5833
% 0.36/1.02  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.36/1.02  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 771
% 0.36/1.02  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.36/1.02  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.36/1.02  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.36/1.02  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 423555
% 0.36/1.02  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 11
% 0.36/1.02  
% 0.36/1.02  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/1.02  # User time                : 0.482 s
% 0.36/1.02  # System time              : 0.019 s
% 0.36/1.02  # Total time               : 0.501 s
% 0.36/1.02  # Maximum resident set size: 1656 pages
% 0.36/1.02  
% 0.36/1.02  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/1.02  # User time                : 2.434 s
% 0.36/1.02  # System time              : 0.061 s
% 0.36/1.02  # Total time               : 2.495 s
% 0.36/1.02  # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.36/1.02  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------