TSTP Solution File: LCL274-3 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL274-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1C4fbiX43v true
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:59:09 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.42s 1.29s
% Output : Refutation 2.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : LCL274-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1C4fbiX43v true
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 05:34:18 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.22/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 2.42/1.29 % Solved by fo/fo5.sh.
% 2.42/1.29 % done 815 iterations in 0.493s
% 2.42/1.29 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 2.42/1.29 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.42/1.29 thf(axiom_type, type, axiom: $i > $o).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(equivalent_type, type, equivalent: $i > $i > $i).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(p_type, type, p: $i).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(q_type, type, q: $i).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(or_type, type, or: $i > $i > $i).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(and_type, type, and: $i > $i > $i).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(theorem_type, type, theorem: $i > $o).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(not_type, type, not: $i > $i).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(prove_this, conjecture,
% 2.42/1.29 (theorem @ ( equivalent @ ( or @ p @ q ) @ ( or @ q @ p ) ))).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 2.42/1.29 (~( theorem @ ( equivalent @ ( or @ p @ q ) @ ( or @ q @ p ) ) )),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (~ (theorem @ (equivalent @ (or @ p @ q) @ (or @ q @ p)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(axiom_1_4, axiom,
% 2.42/1.29 (axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ A @ B ) @ ( or @ B @ A ) ))).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (axiom @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X1) @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_1_4])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(rule_1, axiom, (( theorem @ X ) | ( ~( axiom @ X ) ))).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (theorem @ X0) | ~ (axiom @ X0))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_1])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (theorem @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X1) @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(equivalent_defn, axiom,
% 2.42/1.29 (( equivalent @ P @ Q ) =
% 2.42/1.29 ( and @ ( implies @ P @ Q ) @ ( implies @ Q @ P ) ))).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 ((equivalent @ X0 @ X1)
% 2.42/1.29 = (and @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [equivalent_defn])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(implies_definition, axiom,
% 2.42/1.29 (( implies @ X @ Y ) = ( or @ ( not @ X ) @ Y ))).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(axiom_1_3, axiom, (axiom @ ( implies @ A @ ( or @ B @ A ) ))).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (axiom @ (implies @ X0 @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_1_3])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (theorem @ X0) | ~ (axiom @ X0))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_1])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(axiom_1_5, axiom,
% 2.42/1.29 (axiom @
% 2.42/1.29 ( implies @ ( or @ A @ ( or @ B @ C ) ) @ ( or @ B @ ( or @ A @ C ) ) ))).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (axiom @
% 2.42/1.29 (implies @ (or @ X0 @ (or @ X1 @ X2)) @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_1_5])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (theorem @ X0) | ~ (axiom @ X0))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_1])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl40, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (theorem @
% 2.42/1.29 (implies @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ X2 @ X0)) @ (or @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(rule_2, axiom,
% 2.42/1.29 (( theorem @ X ) | ( ~( theorem @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) ) ) |
% 2.42/1.29 ( ~( theorem @ Y ) ))).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 ( (theorem @ X0)
% 2.42/1.29 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 2.42/1.29 | ~ (theorem @ X1))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl309, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (~ (theorem @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ X2 @ X0)))
% 2.42/1.29 | (theorem @ (or @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl40, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl332, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))
% 2.42/1.29 | (theorem @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ (not @ X2) @ X0))))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl309])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl335, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))
% 2.42/1.29 | (theorem @ (or @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl332, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl650, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (theorem @ (or @ X1 @ (implies @ X0 @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl335])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(axiom_1_2, axiom, (axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ A @ A ) @ A ))).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i]: (axiom @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X0) @ X0))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_1_2])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (theorem @ X0) | ~ (axiom @ X0))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_1])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i]: (theorem @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X0) @ X0))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 ( (theorem @ X0)
% 2.42/1.29 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 2.42/1.29 | ~ (theorem @ X1))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i]: (~ (theorem @ (or @ X0 @ X0)) | (theorem @ X0))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl693, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X0))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl650, zip_derived_cl17])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl335, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))
% 2.42/1.29 | (theorem @ (or @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl332, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl709, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (theorem @ (or @ X1 @ (implies @ (or @ X1 @ X0) @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl693, zip_derived_cl335])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl1186, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ (or @ (not @ X1) @ X0) @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl709])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl1188, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1186, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 ( (theorem @ X0)
% 2.42/1.29 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 2.42/1.29 | ~ (theorem @ X1))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl2539, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (~ (theorem @ X1) | (theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1188, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (theorem @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X1) @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (theorem @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ (not @ X1)) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl21])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 ( (theorem @ X0)
% 2.42/1.29 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 2.42/1.29 | ~ (theorem @ X1))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl224, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (~ (theorem @ (or @ X0 @ (not @ X1)))
% 2.42/1.29 | (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl241, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (not @ X0)))
% 2.42/1.29 | (theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (not @ X1))))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl224])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl2557, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (~ (theorem @ X1)
% 2.42/1.29 | (theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (not @ (implies @ X1 @ (not @ X0))))))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2539, zip_derived_cl241])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(and_defn, axiom,
% 2.42/1.29 (( and @ P @ Q ) = ( not @ ( or @ ( not @ P ) @ ( not @ Q ) ) ))).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 ((and @ X0 @ X1) = (not @ (or @ (not @ X0) @ (not @ X1))))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [and_defn])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 ((and @ X0 @ X1) = (not @ (implies @ X0 @ (not @ X1))))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl2562, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (~ (theorem @ X1) | (theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (and @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2557, zip_derived_cl34])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 ( (theorem @ X0)
% 2.42/1.29 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 2.42/1.29 | ~ (theorem @ X1))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl2570, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (~ (theorem @ X1) | ~ (theorem @ X0) | (theorem @ (and @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2562, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl2605, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 ( (theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))
% 2.42/1.29 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 2.42/1.29 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl2570])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl2710, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (~ (theorem @ (implies @ (or @ X1 @ X0) @ (or @ X0 @ X1)))
% 2.42/1.29 | (theorem @ (equivalent @ (or @ X1 @ X0) @ (or @ X0 @ X1))))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl21, zip_derived_cl2605])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (theorem @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X1) @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl2726, plain,
% 2.42/1.29 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.42/1.29 (theorem @ (equivalent @ (or @ X1 @ X0) @ (or @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2710, zip_derived_cl21])).
% 2.42/1.29 thf(zip_derived_cl3083, plain, ($false),
% 2.42/1.29 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl2726])).
% 2.42/1.29
% 2.42/1.29 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.42/1.29
% 2.42/1.29
% 2.42/1.29 % Terminating...
% 3.08/1.37 % Runner terminated.
% 3.08/1.38 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------