TSTP Solution File: LCL257-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : LCL257-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:56:17 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 24
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 22 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 46 ( 0 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 75 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
( is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(yql,axiom,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',yql) ).
cnf(prove_xhn,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(x,equivalent(equivalent(y,z),equivalent(equivalent(z,x),y)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_xhn) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)))),
yql ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X3,X1)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X3,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X3))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X3)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X3)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X4,X3),equivalent(X2,X4)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X2))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X3,X1)),equivalent(X3,X2))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X3,X2),equivalent(X1,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X3)),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X4),X1)),equivalent(X2,X4))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X3,equivalent(X1,X2))),X3))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),X1))),X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X1,X3)),X3)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),equivalent(X1,X2)),X3))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),X1)),X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X1,equivalent(X3,X2))),X3))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),equivalent(X2,X1))),X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X1,X3)),equivalent(X2,X3)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,equivalent(X1,X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X3,equivalent(X2,X3)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X1)),X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X1,X2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X2,X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(x,equivalent(equivalent(y,z),equivalent(equivalent(z,x),y)))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_xhn]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(x,equivalent(equivalent(y,z),equivalent(equivalent(z,x),y)))),
c_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LCL257-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 00:49:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # new_bool_1 with pid 12062 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 12068 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # Processed clauses : 85
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # ...subsumed : 30
% 0.19/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 53
% 0.19/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Generated clauses : 299
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 221
% 0.19/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Paramodulations : 299
% 0.19/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 60
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of those cached : 43
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 51
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 34
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 17
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 139
% 0.19/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 244
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 119
% 0.19/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 119
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 30
% 0.19/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.19/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 451
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3326
% 0.19/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 8
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1628 pages
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------