%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : LCL239-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 00:40:18 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.08s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP1249/LCL/LCL239-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 17] [nf = 0] [nu = 10] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3625] [nf = 1] [nu = 2008] [ut = 1316]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 11141] [nf = 3] [nu = 7778] [ut = 1509]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 24 secs [nr = 10637669] [nf = 41] [nu = 10294514] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 49 secs [nr = 21567756] [nf = 120416] [nu = 20324533] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 42790026] [nf = 132056] [nu = 39568131] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 42902804] [nf = 132057] [nu = 39651053] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 43016592] [nf = 132063] [nu = 39734881] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 282 secs [nr = 106947453] [nf = 132379] [nu = 98454314] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 117072323
% 	resolvents: 116819641	factors: 252682
% Number of unit clauses generated: 107511193
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 91.83
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 6		[1] = 6		[2] = 1304	[3] = 193	
% [4] = 30491	
% Total = 32000
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 107511193	[2] = 8393080	[3] = 1167940	[4] = 110	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] axiom_1		(+)5	(-)4794
% [1] theorem_1		(+)27170	(-)31
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)27175	(-)4825
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 32000
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 15857477
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 117072323
% Number of unification failures: 243000510
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 866240
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 41291687
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 4384
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 9995382
% Max entries in substitution set: 17
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 39937
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 3816
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 87817592
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 49
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 12
% Number of states in UCFA table: 165187
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 793664
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.31
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.21
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 39
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 360072833
% ConstructUnitClause() = 71931
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.23 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 390241
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------