TSTP Solution File: LCL238-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL238-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:47:46 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 8.46s 3.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  15 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  22   ~;  19   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   4   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (;  49   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ theorem > axiom > or > #nlpp > not > q > p

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(theorem,type,
    theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(or,type,
    or: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(not,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(q,type,
    q: $i ).

tff(axiom,type,
    axiom: $i > $o ).

tff(p,type,
    p: $i ).

tff(f_58,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_56,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_67,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( theorem(X)
      | ~ axiom(X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_60,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_75,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( theorem(X)
      | ~ axiom(or(not(Y),X))
      | ~ theorem(Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_54,axiom,
    ! [A] : axiom(or(not(or(A,A)),A)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_83,axiom,
    ! [X,Z,Y] :
      ( theorem(or(not(X),Z))
      | ~ axiom(or(not(X),Y))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(Y),Z)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_87,axiom,
    ~ theorem(or(not(not(or(not(p),not(q)))),not(or(not(q),not(p))))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [A_4,B_5] : axiom(or(not(or(A_4,B_5)),or(B_5,A_4))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_58]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [A_2,B_3] : axiom(or(not(A_2),or(B_3,A_2))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [X_12] :
      ( ~ axiom(X_12)
      | theorem(X_12) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_67]) ).

tff(c_56,plain,
    ! [A_32,B_33,C_34] : axiom(or(not(or(A_32,or(B_33,C_34))),or(B_33,or(A_32,C_34)))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_60]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [Y_14,X_13] :
      ( ~ theorem(Y_14)
      | ~ axiom(or(not(Y_14),X_13))
      | theorem(X_13) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_75]) ).

tff(c_79,plain,
    ! [A_39,B_40,C_41] :
      ( ~ theorem(or(A_39,or(B_40,C_41)))
      | theorem(or(B_40,or(A_39,C_41))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_14]) ).

tff(c_323,plain,
    ! [B_78,A_79,C_80] :
      ( theorem(or(B_78,or(A_79,C_80)))
      | ~ axiom(or(A_79,or(B_78,C_80))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_79]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [A_1] : axiom(or(not(or(A_1,A_1)),A_1)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_54]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ! [Y_22,X_23] :
      ( ~ theorem(Y_22)
      | ~ axiom(or(not(Y_22),X_23))
      | theorem(X_23) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_75]) ).

tff(c_29,plain,
    ! [A_1] :
      ( ~ theorem(or(A_1,A_1))
      | theorem(A_1) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_22]) ).

tff(c_383,plain,
    ! [A_87,C_88] :
      ( theorem(or(A_87,C_88))
      | ~ axiom(or(A_87,or(or(A_87,C_88),C_88))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_323,c_29]) ).

tff(c_389,plain,
    ! [A_89] : theorem(or(not(A_89),A_89)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_383]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    ! [A_25,B_26] : axiom(or(not(or(A_25,B_26)),or(B_26,A_25))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_58]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ! [A_25,B_26] :
      ( ~ theorem(or(A_25,B_26))
      | theorem(or(B_26,A_25)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_14]) ).

tff(c_400,plain,
    ! [A_90] : theorem(or(A_90,not(A_90))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_389,c_40]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [Y_17,Z_16,X_15] :
      ( ~ theorem(or(not(Y_17),Z_16))
      | ~ axiom(or(not(X_15),Y_17))
      | theorem(or(not(X_15),Z_16)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_83]) ).

tff(c_409,plain,
    ! [X_91,Y_92] :
      ( ~ axiom(or(not(X_91),Y_92))
      | theorem(or(not(X_91),not(not(Y_92)))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_400,c_16]) ).

tff(c_4657,plain,
    ! [Y_614,X_615] :
      ( theorem(or(not(not(Y_614)),not(X_615)))
      | ~ axiom(or(not(X_615),Y_614)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_409,c_40]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(not(not(or(not(p),not(q)))),not(or(not(q),not(p))))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_87]) ).

tff(c_4663,plain,
    ~ axiom(or(not(or(not(q),not(p))),or(not(p),not(q)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4657,c_18]) ).

tff(c_4679,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_4663]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : LCL238-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 14:44:38 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 8.46/3.16  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.46/3.17  
% 8.46/3.17  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.64/3.20  
% 8.64/3.20  Inference rules
% 8.64/3.20  ----------------------
% 8.64/3.20  #Ref     : 0
% 8.64/3.20  #Sup     : 1042
% 8.64/3.20  #Fact    : 0
% 8.64/3.20  #Define  : 0
% 8.64/3.20  #Split   : 0
% 8.64/3.20  #Chain   : 0
% 8.64/3.20  #Close   : 0
% 8.64/3.20  
% 8.64/3.20  Ordering : KBO
% 8.64/3.20  
% 8.64/3.20  Simplification rules
% 8.64/3.20  ----------------------
% 8.64/3.20  #Subsume      : 161
% 8.64/3.20  #Demod        : 362
% 8.64/3.20  #Tautology    : 364
% 8.64/3.20  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 8.64/3.20  #BackRed      : 0
% 8.64/3.20  
% 8.64/3.20  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 8.64/3.20  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 8.64/3.20  
% 8.64/3.20  Timing (in seconds)
% 8.64/3.20  ----------------------
% 8.64/3.20  Preprocessing        : 0.44
% 8.64/3.20  Parsing              : 0.24
% 8.64/3.20  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 8.64/3.20  Main loop            : 1.64
% 8.64/3.20  Inferencing          : 0.62
% 8.64/3.20  Reduction            : 0.45
% 8.64/3.20  Demodulation         : 0.33
% 8.64/3.20  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 8.64/3.20  Subsumption          : 0.44
% 8.64/3.20  Abstraction          : 0.04
% 8.64/3.20  MUC search           : 0.00
% 8.64/3.20  Cooper               : 0.00
% 8.64/3.21  Total                : 2.12
% 8.64/3.21  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 8.64/3.21  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 8.64/3.21  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 8.64/3.21  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------