TSTP Solution File: LCL231-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL231-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 13.64s 13.93s
% Output : Refutation 13.64s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : LCL231-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.10/0.11 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 14:12:51 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.33 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.16/0.33 The process was started by sandbox on n011.cluster.edu,
% 0.16/0.33 Mon Jul 4 14:12:51 2022
% 0.16/0.33 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 29505.
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.16/0.33 set(auto).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.16/0.33 clear(print_given).
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 list(usable).
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.16/0.33 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.16/0.33 in usable.
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 ------------> process usable:
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 ------------> process sos:
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.16/0.36
% 0.16/0.36 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.16/0.36
% 0.16/0.36 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.16/0.36
% 0.16/0.36
% 0.16/0.36 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.16/0.36
% 0.16/0.36 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.16/0.36 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.16/0.36 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.16/0.36 number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.16/0.36 number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.16/0.36 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.16/0.36 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.16/0.36 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.16/0.36 absolute distinct symbol count: 7
% 0.16/0.36 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.16/0.36 distinct function count: 2
% 0.16/0.36 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.16/0.36
% 0.16/0.36 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.16/0.36
% 0.16/0.36
% 0.16/0.36
% 0.16/0.36 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.16/0.36
% 0.16/0.36 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.16/0.36
% 0.16/0.36 =========== start of search ===========
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Model 4 [ 12 1 26 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Model 5 [ 1 1 922 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Model 6 [ 1 2 7474 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Model 7 [ 2 6 24443 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Model 8 [ 2 2 9711 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Model 9 [ 2 54 178089 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Model 10 [ 3 63 168889 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Model 11 [ 3 28 95956 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.46/12.73 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 1765 givens.
% 12.46/12.73
% 12.53/12.80
% 12.53/12.80
% 12.53/12.80 Changing weight limit from 57 to 47.
% 12.53/12.80
% 12.53/12.80 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 1865 givens.
% 12.53/12.80
% 12.53/12.80
% 12.53/12.80
% 12.53/12.80 Changing weight limit from 47 to 40.
% 12.53/12.80
% 12.53/12.80 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 1870 givens.
% 12.53/12.80
% 12.53/12.81
% 12.53/12.81
% 12.53/12.81 Changing weight limit from 40 to 37.
% 12.53/12.81
% 12.53/12.81 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 1875 givens.
% 12.53/12.81
% 12.53/12.82
% 12.53/12.82
% 12.53/12.82 Changing weight limit from 37 to 36.
% 12.53/12.82
% 12.53/12.82 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 1885 givens.
% 12.53/12.82
% 12.53/12.83
% 12.53/12.83
% 12.53/12.83 Changing weight limit from 36 to 35.
% 12.53/12.83
% 12.53/12.83 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 1890 givens.
% 12.53/12.83
% 12.53/12.85
% 12.53/12.85
% 12.53/12.85 Changing weight limit from 35 to 34.
% 12.53/12.85
% 12.53/12.85 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 1900 givens.
% 12.53/12.85
% 12.53/12.86
% 12.53/12.86
% 12.53/12.86 Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 12.53/12.86
% 12.53/12.86 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 1910 givens.
% 12.53/12.86
% 12.62/12.88
% 12.62/12.88
% 12.62/12.88 Changing weight limit from 33 to 32.
% 12.62/12.88
% 12.62/12.88 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 1920 givens.
% 12.62/12.88
% 12.64/12.89
% 12.64/12.89
% 12.64/12.89 Changing weight limit from 32 to 31.
% 12.64/12.89
% 12.64/12.89 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 1930 givens.
% 12.64/12.89
% 12.67/12.92
% 12.67/12.92
% 12.67/12.92 Changing weight limit from 31 to 29.
% 12.67/12.92
% 12.67/12.92 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 1955 givens.
% 12.67/12.92
% 12.67/12.94
% 12.67/12.94
% 12.67/12.94 Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 12.67/12.94
% 12.67/12.94 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 1965 givens.
% 12.67/12.94
% 12.67/13.00
% 12.67/13.00
% 12.67/13.00 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 12.67/13.00
% 12.67/13.00 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 2000 givens.
% 12.67/13.00
% 12.76/13.03
% 12.76/13.03
% 12.76/13.03 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 12.76/13.03
% 12.76/13.03 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 2020 givens.
% 12.76/13.03
% 12.84/13.10
% 12.84/13.10
% 12.84/13.10 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 12.84/13.10
% 12.84/13.10 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 2080 givens.
% 12.84/13.10
% 12.84/13.17
% 12.84/13.17
% 12.84/13.17 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 12.84/13.17
% 12.84/13.17 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 2130 givens.
% 12.84/13.17
% 13.04/13.30
% 13.04/13.30
% 13.04/13.30 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 13.04/13.30
% 13.04/13.30 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 2210 givens.
% 13.04/13.30
% 13.14/13.43
% 13.14/13.43
% 13.14/13.43 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 13.14/13.43
% 13.14/13.43 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 2300 givens.
% 13.14/13.43
% 13.24/13.56
% 13.24/13.56
% 13.24/13.56 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 13.24/13.56
% 13.24/13.56 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 2420 givens.
% 13.24/13.56
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 13.47 sec ----> 10214 [binary,10213.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 7.
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 13.64/13.93 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 13.64/13.93 % SZS output start Refutation
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 13.64/13.93 2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(or(not(B),A))| -theorem(B).
% 13.64/13.93 3 [] {+} theorem(or(not(A),B))| -axiom(or(not(A),C))| -theorem(or(not(C),B)).
% 13.64/13.93 4 [] {+} -theorem(or(not(or(not(or(not(p),q)),or(not(p),r))),or(not(p),or(not(q),r)))).
% 13.64/13.93 5 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 13.64/13.93 6 [] {+} axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))).
% 13.64/13.93 8 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 13.64/13.93 9 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))).
% 13.64/13.93 10 [hyper,5,1] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 13.64/13.93 18 [hyper,10,3,6] {-} theorem(or(not(A),A)).
% 13.64/13.93 32 [hyper,18,2,8] {+} theorem(or(A,or(not(or(A,B)),B))).
% 13.64/13.93 267 [hyper,32,3,6] {-} theorem(or(not(A),or(not(or(not(or(B,A)),C)),C))).
% 13.64/13.93 684 [hyper,267,2,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(not(or(A,B)),C)),or(not(B),C))).
% 13.64/13.93 1187 [hyper,684,2,9] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(not(or(B,C)),D))),or(A,or(not(C),D)))).
% 13.64/13.93 10213 [hyper,1187,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(not(or(A,B)),or(C,D))),or(C,or(not(B),D)))).
% 13.64/13.93 10214 [binary,10213.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 % SZS output end Refutation
% 13.64/13.93 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 ============ end of search ============
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 true clauses given 888 (32.5%)
% 13.64/13.93 false clauses given 1848
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 FALSE TRUE
% 13.64/13.93 13 0 498
% 13.64/13.93 14 0 23
% 13.64/13.93 15 187 529
% 13.64/13.93 16 22 60
% 13.64/13.93 17 1686 493
% 13.64/13.93 18 6 109
% 13.64/13.93 19 603 587
% 13.64/13.93 20 0 137
% 13.64/13.93 21 1 64
% 13.64/13.93 tot: 2505 2500 (50.0% true)
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 Model 11 [ 3 28 95956 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 13.64/13.93
% 13.64/13.93 Process 29505 finished Mon Jul 4 14:13:05 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------