TSTP Solution File: LCL230+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : LCL230+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 17:23:41 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.15s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 44 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 43 ( 12 ~; 17 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 4 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,conjecture,
( ( ( p
| q )
=> ( p
| r ) )
=> ( p
| ( q
=> r ) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpnKxRpq/sel_LCL230+1.p_1',pel5) ).
fof(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ( p
| q )
=> ( p
| r ) )
=> ( p
| ( q
=> r ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
fof(3,negated_conjecture,
( ( ( ~ p
& ~ q )
| p
| r )
& ~ p
& q
& ~ r ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
fof(4,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ p
| p
| r )
& ( ~ q
| p
| r )
& ~ p
& q
& ~ r ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
cnf(5,negated_conjecture,
~ r,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
cnf(6,negated_conjecture,
q,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
cnf(7,negated_conjecture,
~ p,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
cnf(8,negated_conjecture,
( r
| p
| ~ q ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
cnf(10,negated_conjecture,
( p
| r
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[8,6,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(11,negated_conjecture,
( p
| r ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[10,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(12,negated_conjecture,
r,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[11,7,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[12,5,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
13,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/LCL/LCL230+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpnKxRpq/sel_LCL230+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem LCL230+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/LCL/LCL230+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/LCL/LCL230+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------